★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Park supposes that Codification must produce <lb/> | <p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Park supposes that Codification must produce <lb/> | ||
a great change in the law | a great change in the law that this change must give <lb/> | ||
insecurity to property which is a bad thing therefore <lb/> | insecurity to property which is a bad thing therefore <lb/> | ||
the change is a bad thing therefore Codification is a <lb/> | the change is a bad thing therefore Codification is a <lb/> | ||
bad thing | bad thing</p> | ||
<p>Many | <p>Many pages are occupied in dicta of different <lb/> | ||
Judges and arguments addressed to show the necessity <lb/> | Judges and arguments addressed to show the necessity <lb/> | ||
of uniformity of decision | of uniformity of decision but it does not appear <lb/> | ||
what consequence he draws from this position | what consequence he draws from this position</p> | ||
<p>Exordium <del>impossibility</del> vague | <p><foreign>Exordium</foreign> <del>impossibility</del> vague generalities<lb/> | ||
Impossibility of complete codification <lb/> | Impossibility of complete codification<lb/> | ||
Advantage of deciding upon principle | Advantage of deciding upon principle</p> | ||
<p>Arguments against codification appear neither <lb/> | <p>Arguments against codification appear neither <lb/> | ||
to be arguments against legal quibbles or as it is <lb/> | to be arguments against legal quibbles or as it is <lb/> | ||
called <hi rend="underline">strict</hi> interpretation. | called <hi rend="underline">strict</hi> interpretation.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Mr Park supposes that Codification must produce
a great change in the law that this change must give
insecurity to property which is a bad thing therefore
the change is a bad thing therefore Codification is a
bad thing
Many pages are occupied in dicta of different
Judges and arguments addressed to show the necessity
of uniformity of decision but it does not appear
what consequence he draws from this position
Exordium impossibility vague generalities
Impossibility of complete codification
Advantage of deciding upon principle
Arguments against codification appear neither
to be arguments against legal quibbles or as it is
called strict interpretation.
|
Identifier: | JB/075/015/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 75. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
075 |
law amendment |
||
|
015 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e2 |
||
|
street & co |
|||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
24469 |
|||
