★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <del><sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 7</del> March 20<lb/> Procedure Code <!-- brackets in pencil --> (<gap/>)</head> <p>*9<lb/> <note> <sic>Ch</sic> Intermediate</note><lb/>*9 <note>§. 10 Witness Attendance<lb/>requiring Mandate.</note></p> <!-- pencil note --> <p><note>9. Response instrument<lb/> to be required</note></p> <p><del>Instruction</del> <unclear>Inactive</unclear></p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in ink --> <p><sic>Art></sic> In some cases the Judge would <gap/> <lb/> in concert with the party to give intimation to the <del><gap/></del> proposed<lb/> witness of the <gap/> in relation to which he will be<lb/> examined. In some cases <gap/> the Witness knowing<lb/> what by him will <add>net</add> him <gap/> and if any <gap/> <gap/><lb/> <add>will not be needful</add> to his as other cases <del><gap/></del> it will. An example —<lb/> where it is only to speak to the character of a <gap/> or<lb/> a co witness that his testimony is wanted: knowing nothing<lb/> concerning the matter in dispute, the mandate may carry<lb/><del>whether more or less of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>be <gap/> to <gap/> of the papers.</del></p> <p><note> 39<lb/> If supposed witness<lb/>knows nothing written<lb/>assertion to that<lb/> effect to answer the<lb/> purpose of an attendance</note></p><p><foreign> <hi rend="underline">Nil scit</hi></foreign> <gap/> in the Response or Excuse papers<lb/>What may worry now and then happen is — then<lb/> a person who by a party is supposed to know more or less about<lb/> the matter in dispute, in fact does not know any thing about it<lb/> In such case a written assurance to the effect would answer the<lb/> purpose of an attendance, and save so much vexation and<lb/> expense. For the writer of an assertion to this effect the proposed<lb/> witness would be an effectually responsible one for the <gap/> if any other assertion to any other effect. How often might<lb/>be a case in which in the Mandate the Judge might insert<lb/>a <del><gap/></del> clause for the purpose of making it known to the<lb/>proposed witness, a response to this effect will be receivable<lb/>instead of an attendance. But in this case <add> for such a response to <gap/> an effect</add> an extra day<lb/> might be appointed then for attendance or <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> response to epistolary interrogation.</p> <!-- line in ink across the page --> <p>Note (a)<lb/>(a) In English practice for one course or another, <gap/><lb/><gap/> or other <del><gap/></del> public character of high importance<lb/>have any <gap/> and then received <add><gap/> <gap/></add> <gap/> in suits <del>of</del><lb/> the particulars of which have been altogether foreign to this<lb/> knowledge The Chancellor a Judge or Archbishop — any <gap/><lb/> then be dealt with</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1825. Feby 7 March 20
Procedure Code ()
*9
Ch Intermediate
*9 §. 10 Witness Attendance
requiring Mandate.
9. Response instrument
to be required
Instruction Inactive
Art> In some cases the Judge would
in concert with the party to give intimation to the proposed
witness of the in relation to which he will be
examined. In some cases the Witness knowing
what by him will net him and if any
will not be needful to his as other cases it will. An example —
where it is only to speak to the character of a or
a co witness that his testimony is wanted: knowing nothing
concerning the matter in dispute, the mandate may carry
whether more or less of
be to of the papers.
39
If supposed witness
knows nothing written
assertion to that
effect to answer the
purpose of an attendance
Nil scit in the Response or Excuse papers
What may worry now and then happen is — then
a person who by a party is supposed to know more or less about
the matter in dispute, in fact does not know any thing about it
In such case a written assurance to the effect would answer the
purpose of an attendance, and save so much vexation and
expense. For the writer of an assertion to this effect the proposed
witness would be an effectually responsible one for the if any other assertion to any other effect. How often might
be a case in which in the Mandate the Judge might insert
a clause for the purpose of making it known to the
proposed witness, a response to this effect will be receivable
instead of an attendance. But in this case for such a response to an effect an extra day
might be appointed then for attendance or
response to epistolary interrogation.
Note (a)
(a) In English practice for one course or another,
or other public character of high importance
have any and then received in suits of
the particulars of which have been altogether foreign to this
knowledge The Chancellor a Judge or Archbishop — any
then be dealt with
|
Identifier: | JB/057/212/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-03-20 |
20 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
212 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
note (a) |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d9* / e9* |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18542 |
|||
