★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1824 <sic>Oct.</sic> 30<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- In pencil --> <p>2 <lb/><note>Introduction<lb/>Beginning</note><lb/> (1 <!-- in ink --><note> Judges</note></p> <p>The proof of the <hi rend="underline">end</hi> is in the <hi rend="underline">mans</hi> <unclear>interest</unclear></p> <p><add>As to its which author and the principal part of its contents</add><lb/>The Procedure Code at present acted upon in England<lb/>has had <add><del>as to the</del></add> for its authors in an immediate <add>position</add> and action was<lb/> <del>the Great Judges</del> a set of men who to save words may be<lb/><sic>stiled</sic> <add><gap/>for all be</add> the Great Judges, or for still greater conciseness <add>frugality</add> the Judges<lb/> <add>in a</add> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> and <del>p</del> as it were <del><gap/></del> negative and passive<lb/> way the Parliament composed of Kings Lords and Commons<lb/> for whatsoever good or evil has at any time <del><gap/></del> been done by<lb/>a Judge or Judges <del>Parliament</del> has at all times been done under<lb/>the eyes of Parliament, and subject to the power of Parliament.</p> <p>Having had the same Judges for all its authors, the<lb/>Code in question has <del>had</del> from first to last throughout the <unclear>whole time</unclear><lb/> of it the conjoint interest of these its authors. This interest <del><gap/><lb/><gap/></del> has at all times been and still continues to be <del>in a state<lb/> of <add>utmost</add> diametrical</del> throughout the greatest part of the field of legislation<lb/> and judicature in a state of diametrical opposition<lb/>to the interest of the greatest number: this being <add>if <del>this</del> and in so far as this is</add> the case, <del>it</del><lb/> as it is a particular so may it with indisputable <unclear>propensity</unclear><lb/>be <gap/> a sinister interest.</p> <p> In <add>the</add> framing of the existing Code the authors have accordingly<lb/> been at all times <unclear>ruling</unclear> under the dominance of a sinister<lb/> interest: the work has been the product and fruit of that same<lb/> sinister interest.</p> | <head>1824 <sic>Oct.</sic> 30<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- In pencil --> <p>2 <lb/><note>Introduction<lb/>Beginning</note><lb/> (1 <!-- in ink --><note> Judges</note></p> <p>The proof of the <hi rend="underline">end</hi> is in the <hi rend="underline">mans</hi> <unclear>interest</unclear></p> <p><add>As to its <unclear>which</unclear> author and the principal part of its contents</add><lb/>The Procedure Code at present acted upon in England<lb/>has had <add><del>as to the</del></add> for its authors in an immediate <add>position</add> and action was<lb/> <del>the Great Judges</del> a set of men who to save words may be<lb/><sic>stiled</sic> <add><gap/>for all be</add> the Great Judges, or for still greater conciseness <add>frugality</add> the Judges<lb/> <add>in a</add> <del><gap/></del> <gap/> and <del>p</del> as it were <del><gap/></del> negative and passive<lb/> way the Parliament composed of Kings Lords and Commons<lb/> for whatsoever good or evil has at any time <del><gap/></del> been done by<lb/>a Judge or Judges <del>Parliament</del> has at all times been done under<lb/>the eyes of Parliament, and subject to the power of Parliament.</p> <p>Having had the same Judges for all its authors, the<lb/>Code in question has <del>had</del> from first to last throughout the <unclear>whole time</unclear><lb/> of it the conjoint interest of these its authors. This interest <del><gap/><lb/><gap/></del> has at all times been and still continues to be <del>in a state<lb/> of <add>utmost</add> diametrical</del> throughout the greatest part of the field of legislation<lb/> and judicature in a state of diametrical opposition<lb/>to the interest of the greatest number: this being <add>if <del>this</del> and in so far as this is</add> the case, <del>it</del><lb/> as it is a particular so may it with indisputable <unclear>propensity</unclear><lb/>be <gap/> a sinister interest.</p> <p> In <add>the</add> framing of the existing Code the authors have accordingly<lb/> been at all times <unclear>ruling</unclear> under the dominance of a sinister<lb/> interest: the work has been the product and fruit of that same<lb/> sinister interest.</p> | ||
1824 Oct. 30
Procedure Code
2
Introduction
Beginning
(1 Judges
The proof of the end is in the mans interest
As to its which author and the principal part of its contents
The Procedure Code at present acted upon in England
has had as to the for its authors in an immediate position and action was
the Great Judges a set of men who to save words may be
stiled for all be the Great Judges, or for still greater conciseness frugality the Judges
in a and p as it were negative and passive
way the Parliament composed of Kings Lords and Commons
for whatsoever good or evil has at any time been done by
a Judge or Judges Parliament has at all times been done under
the eyes of Parliament, and subject to the power of Parliament.
Having had the same Judges for all its authors, the
Code in question has had from first to last throughout the whole time
of it the conjoint interest of these its authors. This interest
has at all times been and still continues to be in a state
of utmost diametrical throughout the greatest part of the field of legislation
and judicature in a state of diametrical opposition
to the interest of the greatest number: this being if this and in so far as this is the case, it
as it is a particular so may it with indisputable propensity
be a sinister interest.
In the framing of the existing Code the authors have accordingly
been at all times ruling under the dominance of a sinister
interest: the work has been the product and fruit of that same
sinister interest.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/246/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-10-30 |
|||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
246 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18576 |
|||
