JB/057/254/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/254/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. March 20<lb/> Procedure Code<head> <!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>3<lb/> <note><Sic>Ch.</sic> Prospects as to Reform</note><lb/>3 <note>&sect;. 1</note></p> <p> Opponents: 1.  Patrons, 2 Aspirants to patronage<lb/>3. Legal anti-reformists<lb/>4. Political anti reformists</p> <!-- pencil U shaped dividing mark before text to its right --> <p>4. <!-- 3 overwritten --> <gap/> of the <lb/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> resident reformists<lb/> like the Whigs</p> <p>Lawyer could no more wish for perfect <hi rend="underline">health</hi><lb/>than Physicians for <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> <hi rend="underline">Justice</hi></p> <p>So much for the <add>eventual</add> <gap/> and thence the expectation<lb/><gap/> of the <sic>pretent</sic> reform in question.</p> <p>From these however may have to be deducted those<lb/> whose attachment to the abuse have its <gap/> <del>rather</del> in a greater<lb/>degree from <add>in</add> contempt begotten prejudice <gap/> together prejudice,<lb/> is <gap/> witness, <gap/> all then in <add>the</add> sincere<lb/>interest: and as to what proportion these may have to<lb/> those whose conduct will be <add>exclusively</add> determined by a <add>clear comprehensive and</add> just estimate<lb/> of the effects with relation to those interests till<lb/> there will be matter of accident, depending on the <gap/><lb/>of the time.</p> <p> The opponents may be <gap/> and counted<lb/>with much greater certainty and <gap/>.  They may<lb/>be classed a <gap/> fallacy.</p> <p>1. All <del>these</del> persons having a share in the patronage<lb/>of the <sic>prefered</sic> to be suppressed Offices.</p>





Revision as of 09:45, 2 July 2019

Click Here To Edit

<head>1825. March 20
Procedure Code<head>

3
Ch. Prospects as to Reform
3 §. 1

Opponents: 1. Patrons, 2 Aspirants to patronage
3. Legal anti-reformists
4. Political anti reformists

4. of the

resident reformists
like the Whigs

Lawyer could no more wish for perfect health
than Physicians for do Justice

So much for the eventual and thence the expectation
of the pretent reform in question.

From these however may have to be deducted those
whose attachment to the abuse have its rather in a greater
degree from in contempt begotten prejudice together prejudice,
is witness, all then in the sincere
interest: and as to what proportion these may have to
those whose conduct will be exclusively determined by a clear comprehensive and just estimate
of the effects with relation to those interests till
there will be matter of accident, depending on the
of the time.

The opponents may be and counted
with much greater certainty and . They may
be classed a fallacy.

1. All these persons having a share in the patronage
of the prefered to be suppressed Offices.




Identifier: | JB/057/254/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

254

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18584

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in