JB/137/074/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/074/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
<p>All those institutions are good and the <add>bare</add> desire to make any<lb/>
<p>All those institutions are good and the <add>bare</add> desire to make any<lb/>
change in them a crime - and why? only because they use<lb/>
change in them a crime - and why? only because they use<lb/>
English.  English institutions? employed as <gap/> as it employed<lb/>
English.  English institutions? employed as we see it employed<lb/>
the very phrase is a disgrace to those who <add>utter</add> use it, and an affront<lb/>
the very phrase is a disgrace to those who <add>utter</add> use it, and an affront<lb/>
to those to whom it is <add>uttered</add> used.  If the thing is good,  <gap/> it<lb/>
to those to whom it is <add>uttered</add> used.  If the thing is good,  cherish it<lb/>
so far as but no further than it is good.  If it is bad, <del>do</del><lb/>
so far as but no further than it is good.  If it is bad, <del>do</del><lb/>
are you for <gap/> ut <gap/> though it is and, only because it is<lb/>
are you for cherishing it <gap/> though it is bad, only because it is<lb/>
English.  The very phrase thus employed is a disgrace to them<lb/>
English.  The very phrase thus employed is a disgrace to them<lb/>
who <del>utter</del> utter it and an affront to t<del>he use intending of</del><lb/>
who <del>utter</del> utter it and an affront to t<del>he use intending of</del><lb/>
them <del>not</del> be when it is uttered: an affront to their understandings<add>-ings</add>. <lb/>
them <del>not</del> be whom it is uttered: an affront to their understandings<add>-ings</add>. <lb/>
So <del>shel</del> shelved<add>confirmed</add> are they in immorality <add>and  <unclear>commonly</unclear></add> <gap/> that they<lb/>
So <del>shel</del> shelved<add>confirmed</add> are they in immorality <add>and  <unclear>commonly</unclear></add> <gap/> that they<lb/>
will not, or so blinded by prejudice <add>and int<gap/>date</add> that they can not<lb/>
will not, or so blinded by prejudice <add>and intimidated</add> that they can not<lb/>
<add>or</add> and <gap/> not distinguish <add>make any distinction </add> <gap/> what is bad in pre<gap/>ment and what is good.  Oh what is bad for attachment!<lb/>
<add>or</add> and dare not distinguish <add>make any distinction </add> between what is bad in preeminent<lb/>
and what is good.  Oh what is bad for attachment!<lb/>
Oh what a cause for pride? Oh what a confession what <add>in</add> evidence<lb/>
Oh what a cause for pride? Oh what a confession what <add>in</add> evidence<lb/>
and that not the less instruction and <gap/> because so eminently<lb/>
and that not the less instructive and conclusive because so eminently<lb/>
unwilling <add>reluctanr</add> on one that unlikeless <gap/>lation and English<lb/>
unwilling <add>reluctanr</add> on one that unlikeless <gap/>lation and English<lb/>
constitution swarm with abuses all of them so may <gap/>rable<lb/>
constitution swarm with abuses all of them so many <gap/>rable<lb/>
proof that the interest of the few and not that of the many<lb/>
proof that the interest of the few and not that of the many<lb/>
pr<gap/>ded <add>determined</add> at the formation of the which together <add>and</add> that which there<lb/>
pr<gap/>ded <add>determined</add> at the formation of the which together <add>and</add> that which there<lb/>
Line 33: Line 34:
every other in these<lb/>
every other in these<lb/>
times as in all others</note><lb/>
times as in all others</note><lb/>
ruling few, and is the <add>has for its normal <gap/></add> result of not of their benevolence <lb/>
ruling few, and is the <add>has for its moral crime</add> result of not of their benevolence <lb/>
but of their importance.</p>
but of their importance.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:23, 8 July 2019

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan 16

Radicalism not dangerous

III. Experience
III French Revolution
English Implications

All those institutions are good and the bare desire to make any
change in them a crime - and why? only because they use
English. English institutions? employed as we see it employed
the very phrase is a disgrace to those who utter use it, and an affront
to those to whom it is uttered used. If the thing is good, cherish it
so far as but no further than it is good. If it is bad, do
are you for cherishing it though it is bad, only because it is
English. The very phrase thus employed is a disgrace to them
who utter utter it and an affront to the use intending of
them not be whom it is uttered: an affront to their understandings-ings.
So shel shelvedconfirmed are they in immorality and commonly that they
will not, or so blinded by prejudice and intimidated that they can not
or and dare not distinguish make any distinction between what is bad in preeminent
and what is good. Oh what is bad for attachment!
Oh what a cause for pride? Oh what a confession what in evidence
and that not the less instructive and conclusive because so eminently
unwilling reluctanr on one that unlikeless lation and English
constitution swarm with abuses all of them so many rable
proof that the interest of the few and not that of the many
prded determined at the formation of the which together and that which there
is in them that is favourable to the universal interest in his
produced not by but in spite of the endeavours of the [+] in this country as in
every other in these
times as in all others

ruling few, and is the has for its moral crime result of not of their benevolence
but of their importance.



Identifier: | JB/137/074/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46791

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in