★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1831 June 6</p> | |||
<head>Posology</head> | |||
<note><sic>Introducto</sic><lb/> | |||
Mention of elucidation<lb/> | |||
and effectuation</note> | |||
<note>or 1<lb/> | |||
Demonstraton<lb/> | |||
includes effectuation;<lb/> | |||
theorem, problem</note> | |||
<p>Mention a of demonstration — mention of effectuation.<lb/> | |||
L<gap/> clearly not, these no operation will be seen to run<lb/> | |||
one into another. The The latter being included in the former: for<lb/> | |||
of the two sorts of things susceptible of demonstration, one is —<lb/> | |||
that <hi rend="underline">that</hi> what has been undertaken to be done, has, in effect<lb/> | |||
been done</p> | |||
<note>or 2<lb/> | |||
Demonstration is<lb/> | |||
but a means of producing<lb/> | |||
satisfaction:<lb/> | |||
thus in logic, as<lb/> | |||
well as in posology.</note> | |||
<p>But demonstration itself, what is it?</p> | |||
<p>Demonstration a word in two cases — in two senses —<lb/> | |||
in the logical sense, and in the posological sense: <foreign>demonstratio</foreign><lb/> | |||
<!-- Greek lettering -->, — <foreign>demonstr<gap/></foreign> <!-- Greek lettering --></p> | |||
<p>In what is it that they agree? It is — this <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">satisfaction</hi> is afforded to those for which it is d<gap/>.</p> | |||
<p>But to <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> what is it. In both cases it is a p<gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
or it is nothing worth.</p> | |||
<note>or 3<lb/> | |||
conception<lb/> | |||
sufficiently <hi rend="underline">accurate</hi> —<lb/> | |||
sufficiently conformable<lb/> | |||
to the real <hi rend="underline">state of <del>things</del><lb/> | |||
<add>the case</add></hi> to exclude practical<lb/> | |||
errors —</note> | |||
<p>The satisfaction is it <sic>compleat</sic> enough, to afford a<lb/> | |||
<unclear>quick</unclear> to p<gap/>. <gap/> <gap/> as a <unclear>quick</unclear> to <gap/>: that what<lb/> | |||
is in c<gap/> of the demonstrator takes to be true, is it a means<lb/> | |||
to <gap/> being exactly true, that although it is false and erroneous<lb/> | |||
the <gap/>, <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> is not <del><gap/></del> <gap/>able<lb/> | |||
that human suffering in any shape <gap/> were to be made of its<lb/> | |||
being taken for true and being <gap/> <gap/> as such</p> | |||
<note>or 4<lb/> | |||
i.e: error having<lb/> | |||
for its ultimate effect<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">diminution of happiness</hi></note> | |||
<p>In morphoscopics demonstration is taken in a <hi rend="underline">confined</hi><lb/> | |||
sense — a sense in which it is not taken in alegomorphic<lb/> | |||
In alegomorphics <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> is said to<lb/> | |||
be demonstrated. Yet are the <gap/> that are <gap/> to<lb/> | |||
less <gap/> to be <gap/> upon — less secure <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
of practical evil than those that are <gap/> in morphoscopics?</p> | |||
<note>or 5<lb/> | |||
In Algebra, <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">demonstrations none</hi><lb/> | |||
Yet by algebra, upon<lb/> | |||
practical error exclusion<lb/> | |||
is put as surely and<lb/> | |||
effectually, as by Geometry.</note> | |||
<gap/> not. In both ways the <gap/> cannot are the<lb/> | |||
same: in the case of <del><gap/></del> morphoscopic <gap/> is performed —<lb/> | |||
the fiction that <del><gap/></del> in the case in question <gap/> figure<lb/> | |||
1831 June 6
Posology
Introducto
Mention of elucidation
and effectuation
or 1
Demonstraton
includes effectuation;
theorem, problem
Mention a of demonstration — mention of effectuation.
L clearly not, these no operation will be seen to run
one into another. The The latter being included in the former: for
of the two sorts of things susceptible of demonstration, one is —
that that what has been undertaken to be done, has, in effect
been done
or 2
Demonstration is
but a means of producing
satisfaction:
thus in logic, as
well as in posology.
But demonstration itself, what is it?
Demonstration a word in two cases — in two senses —
in the logical sense, and in the posological sense: demonstratio
, — demonstr
In what is it that they agree? It is — this
satisfaction is afforded to those for which it is d.
But to what is it. In both cases it is a p
or it is nothing worth.
or 3
conception
sufficiently accurate —
sufficiently conformable
to the real state of things
the case to exclude practical
errors —
The satisfaction is it compleat enough, to afford a
quick to p. as a quick to : that what
is in c of the demonstrator takes to be true, is it a means
to being exactly true, that although it is false and erroneous
the , is not able
that human suffering in any shape were to be made of its
being taken for true and being as such
or 4
i.e: error having
for its ultimate effect
diminution of happiness
In morphoscopics demonstration is taken in a confined
sense — a sense in which it is not taken in alegomorphic
In alegomorphics is said to
be demonstrated. Yet are the that are to
less to be upon — less secure
of practical evil than those that are in morphoscopics?
or 5
In Algebra,
demonstrations none
Yet by algebra, upon
practical error exclusion
is put as surely and
effectually, as by Geometry.
not. In both ways the cannot are the
same: in the case of morphoscopic is performed —
the fiction that in the case in question figure
|
Identifier: | JB/135/144/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1831-06-06 |
or 1 - or 5 |
||
|
135 |
posology |
||
|
144 |
posology |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
46262 |
|||
