JB/057/266/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/266/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/057/266/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/057/266/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1826 May 12<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>7<lb/> <note>Preface or Introduction<lb/> Beginning</note><lb/> 7</p> <p>Add how Counsel and <gap/> are all to get<lb/>so <gap/> <gap/> the Judges</p> <p> <gap/> thus in their own hands the power of existing<lb/>payment for themselves, and fixing the amount of it according to their<lb/> own pleasure, <del><gap/></del> a person who looks over a table of judicial<lb/> fees in question <add>that</add> may be apt to present itself as &#x2014; how <del><gap/></del> came<lb/> King to be no higher Man than <del><gap/></del> <gap/>?  compared with the price<lb/> paid for other <gap/> compared with the price <add>of the labour</add> of those professional<lb/>men whose operations <add>procured</add> go hand in hand with their own <del><gap/> </del> they will<lb/> <add>be apt to</add> naturally present the idea of <gap/></p> <p>The answer is it was by the nature of the case<lb/>and the moderation of the desire, that the price was first <gap/> <gap/></p> <p> The aggregate <add> amount of</add> price obtained by them for the aggregate amount of the<lb/> services depended upon the numbers of their contributions: suppose<lb/>the price of each service raised, what they gained by the <gap/><lb/>of each payment,  <add>that and more</add> might have been lost by a diminution in<lb/> the number of payments: as it is in so high in the price <add>put upon the species of <gap/></add> that<lb/>by mere inability to pay <del>the</del> <add> it</add> more <gap/> at last of the <unclear>community</unclear><lb/>are obliged to go without it.</p> <p>To settle the amount of individual payments in each<lb/> <gap/> or to give <sic>maximization </sic> to the aggregate, required the utmost<lb/>stretch of evil and judicious calculation: the <del><gap/></del> golden increase<lb/>the strength of the appetite could <add>would by its strength be</add> continually <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> to overpass<lb/>accordingly even in the present time in the case of the First Court<lb/> of Exchequer <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> had been found there be <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> its own<lb/>purpose.</p>  
<head>1826 May 12<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>7<lb/> <note>Preface or Introduction<lb/> Beginning</note><lb/> 7</p> <p>Add how Counsel and <gap/> are all to get<lb/>so much more than Judges</p> <p> <gap/> thus in their own hands the power of existing<lb/>payment for themselves, and fixing the amount of it according to their<lb/> own pleasure, <del><gap/></del> a person who looks over a table of judicial<lb/> fees in question <add>that</add> may be apt to present itself as &#x2014; how <del><gap/></del> came<lb/>they to be no higher than <del><gap/></del> they were?  compared with the price<lb/> paid for other services compared with the price <add>of the labour</add> of those professional<lb/>men whose operations <add>procured</add> go hand in hand with their own <del><gap/> </del> they will<lb/> <add>be apt to</add> naturally present the idea of <gap/></p> <p>The answer is it was by the nature of the case<lb/>and the moderation of the desire, that the price was first <gap/> <gap/></p> <p> The aggregate <add> amount of</add> price obtained by them for the aggregate amount of the<lb/> services depended upon the numbers of their contributions: suppose<lb/>the price of each service raised, what they gained by the <gap/><lb/>of each payment,  <add>that and more</add> might have been lost by a diminution in<lb/> the number of payments: as it is in so high in the price <add>put upon the species of services</add> that<lb/>by mere inability to pay <del>the</del> <add> it</add> more <gap/> at last of the <unclear>community</unclear><lb/>are obliged to go without it.</p> <p>To settle the amount of individual payments in each<lb/> suit or to give <sic>maximization </sic> to the aggregate, required the utmost<lb/>stretch of evil and judicious calculation: the <del><gap/></del> golden increase<lb/>the strength of the appetite could <add>would by its strength be</add> continually <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> to overpass<lb/>accordingly even in the present time in the case of the First Court<lb/> of Exchequer <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> had been found there to frustrate <add> <gap/></add> its own<lb/>purpose.</p>  





Revision as of 09:58, 16 July 2019

Click Here To Edit

1826 May 12
Procedure Code

7
Preface or Introduction
Beginning

7

Add how Counsel and are all to get
so much more than Judges

thus in their own hands the power of existing
payment for themselves, and fixing the amount of it according to their
own pleasure, a person who looks over a table of judicial
fees in question that may be apt to present itself as — how came
they to be no higher than they were? compared with the price
paid for other services compared with the price of the labour of those professional
men whose operations procured go hand in hand with their own they will
be apt to naturally present the idea of

The answer is it was by the nature of the case
and the moderation of the desire, that the price was first

The aggregate amount of price obtained by them for the aggregate amount of the
services depended upon the numbers of their contributions: suppose
the price of each service raised, what they gained by the
of each payment, that and more might have been lost by a diminution in
the number of payments: as it is in so high in the price put upon the species of services that
by mere inability to pay the it more at last of the community
are obliged to go without it.

To settle the amount of individual payments in each
suit or to give maximization to the aggregate, required the utmost
stretch of evil and judicious calculation: the golden increase
the strength of the appetite could would by its strength be continually to overpass
accordingly even in the present time in the case of the First Court
of Exchequer had been found there to frustrate its own
purpose.




Identifier: | JB/057/266/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1826-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

266

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18596

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in