★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. <del>June</del> July 1.<lb/> Procedure or Penal Code</head> <!-- in pencil apart from Ch and section symbol --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface or Introduction</note><lb/>(1 <note>§ . 1 Judges &c. refused — why?</note></p> <p> No half measures! Justification impossible; <hi rend="underline">atone</hi>ment, not<lb/> So here under accusation such as J.B. a proof of consciousness of their < | <head>1826. <del>June</del> July 1.<lb/> Procedure or Penal Code</head> <!-- in pencil apart from Ch and section symbol --> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface or Introduction</note><lb/>(1 <note>§ . 1 Judges &c. refused — why?</note></p> <p> No half measures! Justification impossible; <hi rend="underline">atone</hi>ment, not<lb/> So here under accusation such as J.B. a proof of consciousness of their <unclear>truths</unclear></p> <p>§ . Depravity of the <del> <gap/></del> creators and preservers of the existing System<lb/> <unclear>truly</unclear> thus exposed</p> <p>§§ . The sinister interest of the <del>Judges and other persons by</del> <add> creators and preservers of</add> <lb/>where the existing System <del>has been created in</del> <add> have unsparingly exposed — why</add> why thus exposed</p> <p><note>The existing system<lb/> is <del><gap/></del> in the most<lb/> perfect <gap/> virtues<lb/> in its <hi rend="underline">end</hi> <add>origin in its</add> in its<lb/> principle, <del>it its details</del><lb/> and from first to last<lb/> in its details. It is<lb/> <sic>unamendable</sic></note></p> <p><note> Of these practices proof<lb/> and confirmation will<lb/> be found under any<lb/> head that presents itself</note></p> <p> Reasons why the expense is necessary here. <add>such as were</add> Uses and purposes<lb/>of this expense, two. <!-- paragraph mark in pencil --></p> <p> 1. <add>In addition to the abundance of direct proofs</add> <unclear>Compliance</unclear> on the part of the people in <lb/>general by the presumptions thus afforded the pursuance of<lb/> the utter magnitude of the whole system with reference to its<lb/>professed purpose. </p><!-- paragraph mark in pencil --> <p>2. Destroying the <add>species of</add> influence without the destruction<lb/> of which no effectual remedy can in the nature of the<lb/> case ever be ever applied: to wit the influence of <del>the</del> understanding<lb/> on the part of its functionaries and other persons in question on<lb/>the understanding of those whose interest it is that no apt<lb/> system should be instituted to an apt one</p> <p>1. Destroying the effect of the presumptive counter-evidence<lb/> 1, A year and a half consumed for example in procuring<lb/>an answer and nothing more at the hands of a defendant<lb/> in a case in which supposing him <del> <gap/></del> in consequence<lb/> of <gap/> or summation before the Judge in face of the Plaintiff<lb/> one hour and a half would be more than sufficient to give<lb/> termination to the suit. Proof the multitude of cases determined<lb/> in <unclear>S.</unclear> Small Debt Court as per Hutton each in much less<lb/>than that time: cases in every one of which had the suit been<lb/> brought before a Court called a <del><gap/></del> Equity Court <del>be it <gap/></del> <add> the abovementioned</add> <gap/><lb/><del>would</del> must if the defendant pleases have elapsed before <del><gap/></del><lb/> so much as an answer could be extracted from him. See<lb/> Chancery Commissioners Report and Attorney General Copley's<lb/> Speech towards the close of the last Session of the last Parliament<lb/> <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1826</p> <p><del>All</del> Taken by itself, all this appears undeniable says an<lb/> objector: but if an hour and a half is sufficient for the whole of<lb/> the suit how <del><gap/></del> can you present for a year and a half 's being <gap/> more<lb/> in the unanimous <del><gap/> of</del> <sic>judgment</sic> of men so continually well acquainted<lb/> <add> with</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> with the business, not more<lb/> than sufficient for part<lb/> more easily can I answer<lb/> you to have misrepresented<lb/><!-- continues along right hand edge of the page --> the matter or myself to have mis<gap/> it than that so many presumably learned and dignified Judges and the high <unclear>penitencers</unclear>, <add> for such a succession of <gap/></add> should have concurred without<lb/> a dissenting voice in the giving existence and continuance to so mischievous <lb/> and <gap/> a system of degradation and <gap/></p> | ||
1826. June July 1.
Procedure or Penal Code
Ch. Preface or Introduction
(1 § . 1 Judges &c. refused — why?
No half measures! Justification impossible; atonement, not
So here under accusation such as J.B. a proof of consciousness of their truths
§ . Depravity of the creators and preservers of the existing System
truly thus exposed
§§ . The sinister interest of the Judges and other persons by creators and preservers of
where the existing System has been created in have unsparingly exposed — why why thus exposed
The existing system
is in the most
perfect virtues
in its end origin in its in its
principle, it its details
and from first to last
in its details. It is
unamendable
Of these practices proof
and confirmation will
be found under any
head that presents itself
Reasons why the expense is necessary here. such as were Uses and purposes
of this expense, two.
1. In addition to the abundance of direct proofs Compliance on the part of the people in
general by the presumptions thus afforded the pursuance of
the utter magnitude of the whole system with reference to its
professed purpose.
2. Destroying the species of influence without the destruction
of which no effectual remedy can in the nature of the
case ever be ever applied: to wit the influence of the understanding
on the part of its functionaries and other persons in question on
the understanding of those whose interest it is that no apt
system should be instituted to an apt one
1. Destroying the effect of the presumptive counter-evidence
1, A year and a half consumed for example in procuring
an answer and nothing more at the hands of a defendant
in a case in which supposing him in consequence
of or summation before the Judge in face of the Plaintiff
one hour and a half would be more than sufficient to give
termination to the suit. Proof the multitude of cases determined
in S. Small Debt Court as per Hutton each in much less
than that time: cases in every one of which had the suit been
brought before a Court called a Equity Court be it the abovementioned
would must if the defendant pleases have elapsed before
so much as an answer could be extracted from him. See
Chancery Commissioners Report and Attorney General Copley's
Speech towards the close of the last Session of the last Parliament
Ao 1826
All Taken by itself, all this appears undeniable says an
objector: but if an hour and a half is sufficient for the whole of
the suit how can you present for a year and a half 's being more
in the unanimous of judgment of men so continually well acquainted
with
with the business, not more
than sufficient for part
more easily can I answer
you to have misrepresented
the matter or myself to have mis it than that so many presumably learned and dignified Judges and the high penitencers, for such a succession of should have concurred without
a dissenting voice in the giving existence and continuance to so mischievous
and a system of degradation and
|
Identifier: | JB/057/268/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-07-01 |
|||
|
057 |
penal code; procedure code |
||
|
268 |
procedure or penal code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18598 |
|||
