JB/135/158/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/135/158/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1831 Nov 6</p>
 
<head>Posology</head>
 
<note>Alegomorphics<lb/>
Bookkeeping</note>
 
<p>3</p>
 
<p>I have said <hi rend="underline"><del>errors excepted</del> exceptions excepted</hi>.<lb/>
What then are these exceptions? Answer, this</p>
 
<p>1. An exception would <add>will</add> be, if in the manner of a p<gap/><lb/>
merchant or manufacturer, government sells goods<lb/>
<add>to persons in an intimated <gap/></add> or will no b<gap/> these same goods. But this is what<lb/>
it can scarcely ever happen to it to have need to do.</p>
 
<p>2.</p>
 
<p>2. Will an exception be constituted by the case where <add>in so far as</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> though it buys goods it does not sell those<lb/>
same goods [at the same time]? It should seem<lb/>
not: for in this sort of case, no occasion will then<lb/>
be in the used Double Entry system no no occasion for speaking<lb/>
of <add><gap/></add> goods as d<gap/> to matter of species of goods.</p>
 
<p><add>To the ob<gap/> language</add> No need therefor will there be for this language, in<lb/>
the case where it <add>government</add> is itself the manufacturer of the goods<lb/>
which are employed in its service: as for instance<lb/>
ships, <unclear>much</unclear> artillery: for it is not in the dark<lb/>
practice of selling ships as well as buying them, <add>as many as it has belonging to it</add><lb/>
and <del><gap/></del> by this course of <sic>traffick</sic> seeking profit.<lb/>
True it is, that after <add>its</add> having bought or manufactured<lb/>
a stock of this or that sort of article, there may be a<lb/>
use in government's selling a part of that same<lb/>
stock: <del><gap/></del> as for instance ships or <unclear>materials</unclear> of ship <add>and the <unclear>name of what store</unclear></add><lb/>
when because unserviceable of no longer needful<lb/>
But in <del><gap/></del> none of these cases is there any immediate<lb/>
exchange of goods for goods: only goods &#x2014; the particular<lb/>
sort of goods in question are sold for money: on what<lb/>
occasion, no need of employing the technical language<lb/>
it will (it is believed) be found: no need, any more than<lb/>
when many alone is the subject matter of the account.</p>





Revision as of 09:12, 26 July 2019

Click Here To Edit

1831 Nov 6

Posology

Alegomorphics
Bookkeeping

3

I have said errors excepted exceptions excepted.
What then are these exceptions? Answer, this

1. An exception would will be, if in the manner of a p
merchant or manufacturer, government sells goods
to persons in an intimated or will no b these same goods. But this is what
it can scarcely ever happen to it to have need to do.

2.

2. Will an exception be constituted by the case where in so far as
though it buys goods it does not sell those
same goods [at the same time]? It should seem
not: for in this sort of case, no occasion will then
be in the used Double Entry system no no occasion for speaking
of goods as d to matter of species of goods.

To the ob language No need therefor will there be for this language, in
the case where it government is itself the manufacturer of the goods
which are employed in its service: as for instance
ships, much artillery: for it is not in the dark
practice of selling ships as well as buying them, as many as it has belonging to it
and by this course of traffick seeking profit.
True it is, that after its having bought or manufactured
a stock of this or that sort of article, there may be a
use in government's selling a part of that same
stock: as for instance ships or materials of ship and the name of what store
when because unserviceable of no longer needful
But in none of these cases is there any immediate
exchange of goods for goods: only goods — the particular
sort of goods in question are sold for money: on what
occasion, no need of employing the technical language
it will (it is believed) be found: no need, any more than
when many alone is the subject matter of the account.




Identifier: | JB/135/158/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-11-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

158

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

46276

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in