JB/057/308/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/308/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> +<lb/> Law Amendments</head><!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>10<lb/> <note>Propositions</note><lb/> (1) (10 <note> &sect; . No Oath</note></p> <!-- numbered marginal notes has a O in pencil beside the number --> <p><note>29<lb/> It will not be maintained<lb/> that punishment in a <lb/> future life for falsehood<lb/> depends on the<lb/>performance of the ceremony<lb/> of the oath</note></p> <p>It will scarcely be maintained <add>as fit to be believed </add> that punishment for<lb/> <sic>falshood</sic> in a future life at the hands of almighty justice depends<lb/> altogether on the fact of a man's having on the occasion of the <gap/><lb/> of it borne a part in the ceremony <sic>stiled</sic> <hi rend="underline">swearing</hi> or taking<lb/> an Oath.  If it does not then will <add>the magnitude of</add> that punishment be in its<lb/>quantity <add>in</add> proportioned to the guilt of the act of <sic>falshood</sic> in all <add>other</add><lb/> respects: it will scarcely be maintained as fit to be believed<lb/>that when <add>whenever</add> this ceremony has been performed <add>borne a part in</add> the punishment <lb/> will be in every case the same, whatever for example has<lb/> been, in the full view of the <sic>utterer</sic> of the <sic>falshood</sic>, the causing<lb/> a multitude of innocent persons to lose their lives, is the costing<lb/> some one of them to lose the value of a shilling</p> <p><note>30<lb/>Strange if the certainty<lb/> of immediate punishment<lb/> by the proposed plan<lb/> would not more than<lb/> compensate for the<lb/> supposed additional <lb/> prospect of future punishment<lb/> <del>by the</del> in<lb/> consequence of the oath</note></p> <p>It will be strange indeed, if the <add>contemplative</add> assurance of<lb/> the immediate and almost instant punishment which upon the<lb/>proposed plan will <del><gap/></del> be the consequence of the utterance of the<lb/> <sic>falshood</sic> will not more than compensate for any supposed<lb/>addition that will be made in a future life to the punishment<lb/>proportioned to the <add>particular</add> offence by the punishment for an offence which<lb/> is in <add><del>whatever</del></add> every case the same, that is to say the violation of the<lb/> oath, an offence which thus taken by itself is not productive<lb/> of suffering to any human being in any shape</p> <!-- in pencil + O --> <p><note>31<lb/> Needlessness of the oath<lb/> proved in Denmark</note></p> <p>The needlessness of the ceremony of an oath <add>as a security against <sic>falshood</sic></add> is not<lb/> mere matter of speculation: it is not mere matter of inference <lb/> and argument.  It has been proved in <del>the <gap/></del> Denmark &#x2014; in<lb/> the judicial practice of that country by a very considerable <lb/> length of experience.  In the Year <gap/> <!-- blank space --> a sort of judicatory<lb/> was established under the name of <gap/> Judicatory. <!-- brackets in pencil --> [In<lb/> the mode of its procedure among its arrangements was this, namely<lb/> that no oath was administered on the occasion of any testimony<lb/> there delivered.  The good effects of this institution in the diminution of the <lb/> <add>number</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> number of <gap/> committed<lb/> and thereby <del>and those</del> only<lb/> and not by the expense<lb/> for the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> been<lb/> all carried on without<lb/> pecuniary expense has<lb/> become so notorious, as <lb/> <!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> to have had more or less influence on judicial procedure in countries there <add>its is believed</add> than any, but at any rate, to a certainty in France; witness the seals carried in before the <gap/> <lb/> <add>the</add> <lb/> <!-- continues above --> <foreign>de Paix</foreign>.<lb/> In this sort of Judicatory, whatsoever may be<lb/> <del><gap/></del> the quantity of <sic> falshood</sic> uttered, no <add>legal</add> punishment<lb/> no prosecution follows.  But, if such be<lb/>the effect of the two other of the abovementioned security <lb/> how much greater might not the effect be when punishments<lb/> immediately applied legal punishment is added? <foreign>de <gap/></foreign></p>
<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> +<lb/> Law Amendments</head><!-- numbers in pencil --> <p>10<lb/> <note>Propositions</note><lb/> (1) (10 <note> &sect; . No Oath</note></p> <!-- numbered marginal notes has a O in pencil beside the number --> <p><note>29<lb/> It will not be maintained<lb/> that punishment in a <lb/> future life for falsehood<lb/> depends on the<lb/>performance of the ceremony<lb/> of the oath</note></p> <p>It will scarcely be maintained <add>as fit to be believed </add> that punishment for<lb/> <sic>falshood</sic> in a future life at the hands of almighty justice depends<lb/> altogether on the fact of a man's having on the occasion of the utterance<lb/> of it borne a part in the ceremony <sic>stiled</sic> <hi rend="underline">swearing</hi> or taking<lb/> an Oath.  If it does not then will <add>the magnitude of</add> that punishment be in its<lb/>quantity <add>in</add> proportioned to the guilt of the act of <sic>falshood</sic> in all <add>other</add><lb/> respects: it will scarcely be maintained as fit to be believed<lb/>that when <add>whenever</add> this ceremony has been performed <add>borne a part in</add> the punishment <lb/> will be in every case the same, whatever for example has<lb/> been, in the full view of the <sic>utterer</sic> of the <sic>falshood</sic>, the causing<lb/> a multitude of innocent persons to lose their lives, is the costing<lb/> some one of them to lose the value of a shilling</p> <p><note>30<lb/>Strange if the certainty<lb/> of immediate punishment<lb/> by the proposed plan<lb/> would not more than<lb/> compensate for the<lb/> supposed additional <lb/> prospect of future punishment<lb/> <del>by the</del> in<lb/> consequence of the oath</note></p> <p>It will be strange indeed, if the <add>contemplative</add> assurance of<lb/> the immediate and almost instant punishment which upon the<lb/>proposed plan will <del><gap/></del> be the consequence of the utterance of the<lb/> <sic>falshood</sic> will not more than compensate for any supposed<lb/>addition that will be made in a future life to the punishment<lb/>proportioned to the <add>particular</add> offence by the punishment for an offence which<lb/> is in <add><del>whatever</del></add> every case the same, that is to say the violation of the<lb/> oath, an offence which thus taken by itself is not productive<lb/> of suffering to any human being in any shape</p> <!-- in pencil + O --> <p><note>31<lb/> Needlessness of the oath<lb/> proved in Denmark</note></p> <p>The needlessness of the ceremony of an oath <add>as a security against <sic>falshood</sic></add> is not<lb/> mere matter of speculation: it is not mere matter of inference <lb/> and argument.  It has been proved in <del>the <gap/></del> Denmark &#x2014; in<lb/> the judicial practice of that country by a very considerable <lb/> length of experience.  In the Year <gap/> <!-- blank space --> a sort of judicatory<lb/> was established under the name of <gap/> Judicatory. <!-- brackets in pencil --> [In<lb/> the mode of its procedure among its arrangements was this, namely<lb/> that no oath was administered on the occasion of any testimony<lb/> there delivered.  The good effects of this institution in the diminution of the <lb/> <add>number</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> number of <gap/> committed<lb/> and thereby <del>and those</del> only<lb/> and not by the expense<lb/> for the suit<del><gap/></del> been<lb/> all carried on without<lb/> pecuniary expense has<lb/> become so notorious, as <lb/> <!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> to have had more or less influence on judicial procedure in countries there <add>its is believed</add> than any, but at any rate, to a certainty in France; witness the seals carried in before the <gap/> <lb/> <add>the</add> <lb/> <!-- continues above --> <foreign>de Paix</foreign>.<lb/> In this sort of Judicatory, whatsoever may be<lb/> <del><gap/></del> the quantity of <sic> falshood</sic> uttered, no <add>legal</add> punishment<lb/> no prosecution follows.  But, if such be<lb/>the effect of the two other of the abovementioned security <lb/> how much greater might not the effect be when punishments<lb/> immediately applied legal punishment is added? <foreign>de <gap/></foreign></p>





Revision as of 15:29, 9 August 2019

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr +
Law Amendments

10
Propositions
(1) (10 § . No Oath

29
It will not be maintained
that punishment in a
future life for falsehood
depends on the
performance of the ceremony
of the oath

It will scarcely be maintained as fit to be believed that punishment for
falshood in a future life at the hands of almighty justice depends
altogether on the fact of a man's having on the occasion of the utterance
of it borne a part in the ceremony stiled swearing or taking
an Oath. If it does not then will the magnitude of that punishment be in its
quantity in proportioned to the guilt of the act of falshood in all other
respects: it will scarcely be maintained as fit to be believed
that when whenever this ceremony has been performed borne a part in the punishment
will be in every case the same, whatever for example has
been, in the full view of the utterer of the falshood, the causing
a multitude of innocent persons to lose their lives, is the costing
some one of them to lose the value of a shilling

30
Strange if the certainty
of immediate punishment
by the proposed plan
would not more than
compensate for the
supposed additional
prospect of future punishment
by the in
consequence of the oath

It will be strange indeed, if the contemplative assurance of
the immediate and almost instant punishment which upon the
proposed plan will be the consequence of the utterance of the
falshood will not more than compensate for any supposed
addition that will be made in a future life to the punishment
proportioned to the particular offence by the punishment for an offence which
is in whatever every case the same, that is to say the violation of the
oath, an offence which thus taken by itself is not productive
of suffering to any human being in any shape

31
Needlessness of the oath
proved in Denmark

The needlessness of the ceremony of an oath as a security against falshood is not
mere matter of speculation: it is not mere matter of inference
and argument. It has been proved in the Denmark — in
the judicial practice of that country by a very considerable
length of experience. In the Year a sort of judicatory
was established under the name of Judicatory. [In
the mode of its procedure among its arrangements was this, namely
that no oath was administered on the occasion of any testimony
there delivered. The good effects of this institution in the diminution of the
number
number of committed
and thereby and those only
and not by the expense
for the suit been
all carried on without
pecuniary expense has
become so notorious, as
to have had more or less influence on judicial procedure in countries there its is believed than any, but at any rate, to a certainty in France; witness the seals carried in before the
the
de Paix.
In this sort of Judicatory, whatsoever may be
the quantity of falshood uttered, no legal punishment
no prosecution follows. But, if such be
the effect of the two other of the abovementioned security
how much greater might not the effect be when punishments
immediately applied legal punishment is added? de




Identifier: | JB/057/308/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1827-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

29-31

Box

057

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

308

Info in main headings field

law amendments

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d10 / e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18638

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in