★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head> Law Amendment</head> <!-- in pencil --><p>B (12</p> <p><note>Propositions<lb/> § 4. No Oath</note></p> <!-- pencil O in the margin against each paragraph --><p> From religion not from any thing else must the <del>objections to</del> <lb/> objections to the disuse of this ceremony come whether<lb/> from that source any valid and adequate objections can<lb/> come the following observations which could not otherwise<lb/> have been inserted show</p> <p>Of the incongruity as well as mischievousness of this<lb/> ceremony a pretty ample exposure has been made in<lb/> more publications than one, not a syllable in the way<lb?> of answer of those objections ever met with. If any<lb/> such objections could have been found would the<lb/> whole Church have been silent <!-- brackets in pencil --> [What say My Lord<lb/> the Bishop, what the Ones to <gap/> <del><gap/></del> ]</p> <p>If <add>in the Lords House</add> <gap/> by the Lords Spiritual <del>in the</del> <add> of the Church of England <gap/></add> nor by the Lords Temporal<lb/> of the <del><gap/></del> Presbyterian persuasion any appropriate argument <gap/><lb/> <del><gap/></del> adduced against the proposed disuse of this ceremony, the arguments<lb/> as <del><gap/><del> support of the proposal may well be regarded as unanswerable. </p> <p><note><hi rend="underline">Notary numbers</hi> is<lb/> not an appropriate<lb/>argument.<lb/> <del>§ 2. Codification<lb/> 1 Offences collectively<lb?> Good and <gap/> <gap/></del></note></p> <p><del>Meaning by equality nothing more than abuse<lb/> of <gap/> <gap/> quality for a <gap/> equality neither<lb/> is desirable nor would be possible.</del></p> <p> <del>From different modes of distribution follow different <gap/> of<lb/> comfort and sufferings in the <gap/> of the <gap/> <gap/> and <gap/></del></p> | |||
Law Amendment
B (12
Propositions
§ 4. No Oath
From religion not from any thing else must the objections to
objections to the disuse of this ceremony come whether
from that source any valid and adequate objections can
come the following observations which could not otherwise
have been inserted show
Of the incongruity as well as mischievousness of this
ceremony a pretty ample exposure has been made in
more publications than one, not a syllable in the way<lb?> of answer of those objections ever met with. If any
such objections could have been found would the
whole Church have been silent [What say My Lord
the Bishop, what the Ones to ]
If in the Lords House by the Lords Spiritual in the of the Church of England nor by the Lords Temporal
of the Presbyterian persuasion any appropriate argument
adduced against the proposed disuse of this ceremony, the arguments
as support of the proposal may well be regarded as unanswerable.
<note>Notary numbers is
not an appropriate
argument.
§ 2. Codification
1 Offences collectively<lb?> Good and </note>
Meaning by equality nothing more than abuse
of quality for a equality neither
is desirable nor would be possible.
From different modes of distribution follow different of
comfort and sufferings in the of the and
|
Identifier: | JB/057/310/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-03 |
|||
|
057 |
law amendment |
||
|
310 |
law amendmt |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e12 |
||
|
brocklesby & morbey 1827 |
|||
|
edmund henry barker |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
18640 |
|||
