★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826 May 12 <lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><!-- in pencil --> 1 <note>Preface or Introduction<lb/>Beginning</note><lb/> 1 | <head>1826 May 12 <lb/> | ||
Procedure Code</head> | |||
<p><!-- in pencil --> 1 <note>Preface or Introduction<lb/> | |||
Beginning</note><lb/> | |||
1</p> | |||
<p>☞ State all the judicial <hi rend="underline">offices</hi><lb/> | |||
&c in the strongest term saying<lb/> | |||
nothing of the individual the rest of<lb/> | |||
individuals have not been charged with them &c</p> | |||
<p><note>If the same or <add>even</add> less benefit<lb/> | |||
from bad procedure even given<lb/> | |||
to Judges &c under the name<lb/> | |||
of reward, everybody would cry<lb/> | |||
out.</note></p> | |||
<!-- under finger pointing note, but not in the same ink --> | |||
<p>How from want of interest<lb/> | |||
and knowledge the authority<lb/> | |||
given to Judges for legislation<lb/> | |||
failed of its effect.</p> | |||
<p>1 How all the abuse grew out of the mode of payment<lb/> | |||
2 How a substitute to legislation grew out of judicature<lb/> | |||
3. Device employed for concealing the usurpation of the legislative authority<lb/> | |||
4. Concealment by hypocrisy</p> | |||
<p>Preface or Introduction</p> | |||
<p>§. 1. This the first system of procedure of which justice was the <del>ob</del> first object</p> | |||
<p>Without much danger of errors the present<lb/> | |||
may be stated as being the very first system of judicial<lb/> | |||
procedure that ever had for its object or say<lb/> | |||
end-in-view the giving execution and effect <add>given</add> to the<lb/> | |||
system of substantive law or more shortly the end<lb/> | |||
of justice. <del>T</del> <add>In regard to the substantive system </add> In every country <del> the <gap/> system</del> it<lb/> | |||
had <add>of course</add> for its end in view the particular <del>end</del> interest of<lb/> | |||
the men <add>rulers</add> in power whoever they were by whose power<lb/> | |||
alone execution and effect could in any degree be<lb/> | |||
given to it. In these one persons <del>the</del> whoever they<lb/> | |||
were they could not suffice for applying to individual<lb/> | |||
cases and individual persons and things such regulation<lb/> | |||
and institution as they took upon them to establish, <add>ordain</add><lb/> | |||
it was therefore matter of necessity for them to delegate<lb/> | |||
that function to others <del>in a word</del> <add>in a word to Judges</add> to others who in virtue<lb/> | |||
of this delegation became Judges. But as the particular<lb/> | |||
interests <add>of legislators</add> gave rise to the system of legislation, so did the<lb/> | |||
particular interests of Judges give rise to <del>j</del> the system of<lb/> | |||
judicature. But when two different particular interests<lb/> | |||
<add>and corresponding aptitudes</add> even those <del>both</del> together brought into notice, both could not<lb/> | |||
receive <sic>compleat</sic> satisfaction; of the several objects of<lb/> | |||
general desire <del>such</del> the whole aggregate was coveted by<lb/> | |||
each and the whole could not be had by each: <del>a <add>an</add></del> sort<lb/> | |||
<del>an adjustment</del> a partition in some proportion or other<lb/> | |||
was necessary. A partition was not only necessary <del>to</del> and<lb/> | |||
possible: a compromise was not possible. A compromise <lb/> | |||
supposes a mutual explanation: on the <add><gap/></add> part of each party<lb/> | |||
a declaration and avowal of his pretension</p> | |||
<p><add>But</add></p> | |||
<!-- In the margin under the first note in ink --> <p><note>Sinister interest <sic>expence</sic><lb/> | |||
a necessary <unclear>preliminary</unclear><lb/> | |||
viz. to take off the opposing<lb/> | |||
weight of authority:<lb/> | |||
for <sic>till</sic> this opposition is<lb/> | |||
removed there comes the<lb/> | |||
argument from the matchless<lb/> | |||
constitution intellectual<lb/> | |||
aptitude and the <gap/><lb/> | |||
aptitude of the <lb/> | |||
opposite</note></p> | |||
<p><note> (In this <gap/>, therefore <lb/> | |||
as language is to be <lb/> | |||
<gap/></note></p> | |||
<!-- line in ink across the page --> | |||
<p><note> <hi rend="underline">Rulers <gap/></hi> A&c<lb/> | |||
<del>they may be called,<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
but without being <hi rend="underline">legislators</hi></note></p> | |||
<!-- line in ink across the page --> <p><note>By professional men<lb/> | |||
of high reputation<lb/> | |||
<add>given the name</add> the <unclear>Clearing</unclear> Judges<lb/> | |||
<del>has been</del> stand charged<lb/> | |||
with offences for which <lb/> | |||
but for the protective <unclear>devices</unclear><lb/> | |||
from <gap/> and <gap/><lb/> | |||
they might have been<lb/> | |||
any person at large<lb/> | |||
who might be men<lb/> | |||
of the law be<lb/> | |||
<gap/> in <gap/><lb/> | |||
punishment to whipping<lb/> | |||
<gap/> or transportation</note></p> | |||
<p><note>Object — <gap/><lb/> | |||
<unclear>manuscript</unclear></note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1826 May 12
Procedure Code
1 Preface or Introduction
Beginning
1
☞ State all the judicial offices
&c in the strongest term saying
nothing of the individual the rest of
individuals have not been charged with them &c
If the same or even less benefit
from bad procedure even given
to Judges &c under the name
of reward, everybody would cry
out.
How from want of interest
and knowledge the authority
given to Judges for legislation
failed of its effect.
1 How all the abuse grew out of the mode of payment
2 How a substitute to legislation grew out of judicature
3. Device employed for concealing the usurpation of the legislative authority
4. Concealment by hypocrisy
Preface or Introduction
§. 1. This the first system of procedure of which justice was the ob first object
Without much danger of errors the present
may be stated as being the very first system of judicial
procedure that ever had for its object or say
end-in-view the giving execution and effect given to the
system of substantive law or more shortly the end
of justice. T In regard to the substantive system In every country the system it
had of course for its end in view the particular end interest of
the men rulers in power whoever they were by whose power
alone execution and effect could in any degree be
given to it. In these one persons the whoever they
were they could not suffice for applying to individual
cases and individual persons and things such regulation
and institution as they took upon them to establish, ordain
it was therefore matter of necessity for them to delegate
that function to others in a word in a word to Judges to others who in virtue
of this delegation became Judges. But as the particular
interests of legislators gave rise to the system of legislation, so did the
particular interests of Judges give rise to j the system of
judicature. But when two different particular interests
and corresponding aptitudes even those both together brought into notice, both could not
receive compleat satisfaction; of the several objects of
general desire such the whole aggregate was coveted by
each and the whole could not be had by each: a an sort
an adjustment a partition in some proportion or other
was necessary. A partition was not only necessary to and
possible: a compromise was not possible. A compromise
supposes a mutual explanation: on the part of each party
a declaration and avowal of his pretension
But
Sinister interest expence
a necessary preliminary
viz. to take off the opposing
weight of authority:
for till this opposition is
removed there comes the
argument from the matchless
constitution intellectual
aptitude and the
aptitude of the
opposite
(In this , therefore
as language is to be
Rulers A&c
they may be called,
but without being legislators
By professional men
of high reputation
given the name the Clearing Judges
has been stand charged
with offences for which
but for the protective devices
from and
they might have been
any person at large
who might be men
of the law be
in
punishment to whipping
or transportation
Object —
manuscript
Identifier: | JB/057/260/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-05-12 |
|||
057 |
procedure code |
||
260 |
procedure code |
||
001 |
preface or introduction |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
18590 |
|||