JB/135/157/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/157/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
it to do with goods: and it is only in <add>in so far as</add> the mention<lb/>
it to do with goods: and it is only in <add>in so far as</add> the mention<lb/>
<add>is</add> made of <hi rend="underline">goods</hi>, that the fictions <add>are employed</add> by which such a<lb/>
<add>is</add> made of <hi rend="underline">goods</hi>, that the fictions <add>are employed</add> by which such a<lb/>
cloud of obscurity <unclear>were</unclear> accounts kept in the method<lb/>
cloud of obscurity were accounts kept in the method<lb/>
by <add>in</add> which the practice of double entry is employed. <add>has place.</add></p>
by <add>in</add> which the practice of double entry is employed. <add>has place.</add></p>


<p>This being the case, <del>if</del> whereas <add>if, and as often as</add> without<lb/>
<p>This being the case, <del>if</del> whereas <add>if, and as often as</add> without<lb/>
intimation given of this destination, the employment<lb/>
intimation given of this destination, the employment<lb/>
given to the Double Entry system, is <gap/> of in<lb/>
given to the Double Entry system, is spoken of in<lb/>
terms of <add>either</add> approbation or of disapprobation, the<lb/>
terms of <add>either</add> approbation or of disapprobation, the<lb/>
tendency of such language is to lead to erroneous<lb/>
tendency of such language is to lead to erroneous<lb/>
Line 30: Line 30:
of the security it is capable of affording <add>in the nature of it to afford</add> against loss<lb/>
of the security it is capable of affording <add>in the nature of it to afford</add> against loss<lb/>
<del>by <gap/></del> against loss by peculation on the part<lb/>
<del>by <gap/></del> against loss by peculation on the part<lb/>
of its functionaries: on the other hand if, <add><unclear>wherein</unclear></add> and as often<lb/>
of its functionaries: on the other hand if, <add>wherein</add> and as often<lb/>
as it is employed in the case <del><gap/></del> where goods given <add>transferred</add><lb/>
as it is employed in the case <del><gap/></del> where goods given <add>transferred</add><lb/>
in exchange for goods constitute part of the subject matter<lb/>
in exchange for goods constitute part of the subject matter<lb/>
Line 38: Line 38:
to all persons to whom that language is not<lb/>
to all persons to whom that language is not<lb/>
familiar: and as to all persons in whose instance it<lb/>
familiar: and as to all persons in whose instance it<lb/>
is needful to the purpose of their being <add>when error has place</add> appraised of <del><gap/><lb/>
is needful to the purpose of their being <add>when error has place</add> appraised of the <del><gap/><lb/>
on the part of <gap/></del> existence of such error, it<lb/>
on the part of <gap/></del> existence of such error, it<lb/>
prevents their being appraised of it, and leaves them<lb/>
prevents their being appraised of it, and leaves them<lb/>

Revision as of 08:31, 17 September 2019

Click Here To Edit

1831 Nov. 6

Posology

Alegomorphics
Bookkeeping

2

In the case of the accounts of a governments (exceptions
excepted) no employment is there for the technical
language: why? because gov of these accounts
money constitutes is the only subject matter: nothing has
it to do with goods: and it is only in in so far as the mention
is made of goods, that the fictions are employed by which such a
cloud of obscurity were accounts kept in the method
by in which the practice of double entry is employed. has place.

This being the case, if whereas if, and as often as without
intimation given of this destination, the employment
given to the Double Entry system, is spoken of in
terms of either approbation or of disapprobation, the
tendency of such language is to lead to erroneous
practice.. If, in the government accounts in question the
method is not employed, the government loses the benefit
of the security it is capable of affording in the nature of it to afford against loss
by against loss by peculation on the part
of its functionaries: on the other hand if, wherein and as often
as it is employed in the case where goods given transferred
in exchange for goods constitute part of the subject matter
of, and if in the taking and keeping account of its their transactions
the technical language at present employed in the Double
Entry system is employed, the accounts are utterly unintelligible
to all persons to whom that language is not
familiar: and as to all persons in whose instance it
is needful to the purpose of their being when error has place appraised of the
on the part of
existence of such error, it
prevents their being appraised of it, and leaves them
or those for whom they act, exposed to be deceived and
defrauded.



Identifier: | JB/135/157/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-11-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

157

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46275

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in