JB/063/039/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/039/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- This double page, almost detached in half across the middle, is organised in two columns with a margin to the left of each.  The top half is transcribed first --> <!-- heading across the two columns --><head>INTRODUCTION. False Division &#x2014; <foreign>Portea</foreign> Practical influence of the foregoing error [+] <!-- see marginal note --><sic>v. marg.</sic> p.1<head> <!-- left hand column --><p><del>Christianity</del> <add> Revelation</add>, in as far as <add>so far</add> it <del>is</del> <add>comes under the nature of a perfect</add> Law, <del>that</del><lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add>is</add> contains specific precepts along with<lb/> a Sanction, can never be considered as intending<lb/> to regulate men's conduct <add>actions</add> in other aspects<lb/> than those in which they are left<lb/> free by the State.  For <add>[Present]</add> Happiness and this<lb/> <add>life</add> being one of it's <add>two</add> ends, &amp; <add>being</add> the evidence <add.that</add> of the <lb/> other <add>of them</add> (namely future happiness) <add>in another life'</add> being so, <add>such</add> <lb/> &amp; Present Happiness being no otherwise attainable <add> maintainable</add> <lb/> than by the subordination of private<lb?> interests (or the interests of this or that individual)<lb/> to <hi rend="underline">public</hi> interest, (or the interest of the<lb/> majority) of which interest the State, i.e.<lb/> (the rulers for the time being) must be the<lb/> Judge &#x2014; to enjoin a man to draw from it<lb?> any role of conduct counter to that which<lb/> the state prescribes, would be <add>have been</add> to counteract<lb/> its two ends <add>purposes</add>  Accordingly the <add> divine</add> Author of our<lb/> Religion instead of launching into distinctions<lb/> [as his successors have done] between what is Cesar's<lb/> and what not his <gap/> in this <gap/></p> <!-- left hand margin of the first column --> <p><note>Moses, who with all<lb/> the assistance he<lb/> had from <gap/><lb/> found so much difficulty<lb/> in keeping <lb/> the restive people<lb?> he <gap/> in tolerable<lb/> subjection<lb/> what would have been the<lb/> <del><gap/> to <gap/> <gap/></del> <lb/> surprize of <gap/>, to<lb/> have been told<lb?> <del>a <gap/.</del> that so<lb/> many ages after<lb/> his death many<add> <gap/>,/add> <lb/> a great people <add>nation<a/dd> in<lb/> which a small remnant<lb/> of that people<lb/> were glad to find<lb/> a shelter, may of<lb/> his ordinances would<lb/> <!-- continues after separate marginal addition --> be received with an<lb/> <gap/> of which<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> saw one</note></p> <p><note>[+] v. <foreign>Titulum hug. pag.</foreign><lb/> Blackstone's opinion.<lb/> which offers<lb/> itself as a firebrand<lb?> to the hands of<lb/> fanaticism.</note></p>





Revision as of 10:36, 2 October 2019

Click Here To Edit

<head>INTRODUCTION. False Division — Portea Practical influence of the foregoing error [+] v. marg. p.1<head>

Christianity Revelation, in as far as so far it is comes under the nature of a perfect Law, that
is contains specific precepts along with
a Sanction, can never be considered as intending
to regulate men's conduct actions in other aspects
than those in which they are left
free by the State. For [Present] Happiness and this
life being one of it's two ends, & being the evidence <add.that</add> of the
other of them (namely future happiness) in another life' being so, such
& Present Happiness being no otherwise attainable maintainable
than by the subordination of private<lb?> interests (or the interests of this or that individual)
to public interest, (or the interest of the
majority) of which interest the State, i.e.
(the rulers for the time being) must be the
Judge — to enjoin a man to draw from it<lb?> any role of conduct counter to that which
the state prescribes, would be have been to counteract
its two ends purposes Accordingly the divine Author of our
Religion instead of launching into distinctions
[as his successors have done] between what is Cesar's
and what not his in this

Moses, who with all
the assistance he
had from
found so much difficulty
in keeping
the restive people<lb?> he in tolerable
subjection
what would have been the
to
surprize of , to
have been told<lb?> a <gap/. that so
many ages after
his death many<add> ,/add>
a great people <add>nation<a/dd> in
which a small remnant
of that people
were glad to find
a shelter, may of
his ordinances would
be received with an
of which
saw one

[+] v. Titulum hug. pag.
Blackstone's opinion.
which offers
itself as a firebrand<lb?> to the hands of
fanaticism.




Identifier: | JB/063/039/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

039

Info in main headings field

introd. law divine - no separate rule of action - practical ill-consequences

Image

002

Titles

introduction - false division

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[...?]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20228

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in