JB/157/041/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/157/041/003: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 76: Line 76:




31
<p>31</p>
<p>Contract plan.<lb/>
<p>Contract plan.<lb/>
It saves the necessity<lb/>
It saves the necessity<lb/>
Line 83: Line 83:
37,38 37* 38*</p>
37,38 37* 38*</p>


1. Against cruelty no
<p>1. Against cruelty no<lb/>
details
details</p>


2. Against indugence
<p>2. Against indulgence<lb/>
a few
a few</p>


3. For economy none
<p>3. For economy none</p>


32 Penit. Act. harm
it does by <add>the</add> regulations
it <gap/> in this
view. p 38*


33
of Regulations with
a view to economy
the prosperity defends
in fluctuating circumstances,
p. 39


34
<p>32</p>
Power of amendment
<p>Penit. Act. harm<lb/>
in the legislative
it does by <add>the</add> regulations<lb/>
way no sufficient
it <gap/> in this<lb/>
remedy against
view. p 38*</p>
mistakes
 
thus made. p.40
<p>33</p>
<p>of Regulations with<lb/>
a view to economy<lb/>
the propriety depends<lb/>
on fluctuating circumstances,
p. 39</p>
 
<p>34</p>
<p>Power of amendment<lb/>
in the legislature<lb/>
my insufficient<lb/>
remedy against<lb/>
mistakes<lb/>
thus made. p.40</p>
 
<p>Return to Penit.<lb/>
Act.</p><pb/>
 
35
Though the Contract
plan were negligible
for a
Poorhouse, it wouldnot be for a
Penit.
house. p.41.
 
36
Difference
1. In the object
the comfort
his punishment.
p.41
 
37
2. In the strength
of the checks
Then no publi<gap/>,
great publicity.
p.42
 
38
3. In the sort of
person likely to
be chosed p.43
 
39
Inconsistency of
Penit. Act. its
inconsistency in
giving <add>most</add> unsub<gap/>ted
management to
the Penit. Act
when it gave <gap/>
interested
to the Hulks. p.
45
Penit. HOuse
1. Affords almost
attempt to  <gap/>
 
2. Went endure foreign
regulation
 
3. Wants no official
<add>&amp; paid</add> inspection
 
4. Peculiarly open
to inspection.
Hulks contain
 
3g(a)
Compbile - his management
<gap/>
- a Bush<gap/>


Return to Penit.
Act.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:00, 14 October 2019

Click Here To Edit

25

In what which respect Board
management is worse
than single trust management

25*

Salary & weaking instead
of strengthening
the connection between

interest and duty p.32*

26253

— and that the more
& the larger it is. p.31*

25

and renders the getting
a fit man the less probable.
p.32 **

26

Even without salary
trust management is bad
by the inlet it affords to
negligence and peculation
through blind confidence
p.33,34.33*,34*

Negligence gain any
by an amusement less is no
lee to him

2. Living power no evidence
of living the business

3. Liking it one time, time
of his liking it another

27

Dialogue between Gentlemen
and public. p.34

27(a)

St Andrews peculator

p.33*

27 (b)

See p. p.33**

Dialogue between Public
& Contractor. p. 33***


---page break---

29

Salaries -
adjusted by the
Penit. Act. p.35

29*

Complication of
intrigue resulting
from the separating
the power of salarying
from the power
of appointment
p.36

30

Legislation can
do no more than
have the path open
---page break---
for the Contract
plan & the possibility
of a bad choice
can not be obviated
in any other mode
p.35*


---page break---


31

Contract plan.
It saves the necessity
of regulations in
great measure. p. 37,38 37* 38*

1. Against cruelty no
details

2. Against indulgence
a few

3. For economy none


32

Penit. Act. harm
it does by the regulations
it in this
view. p 38*

33

of Regulations with
a view to economy
the propriety depends
on fluctuating circumstances, p. 39

34

Power of amendment
in the legislature
my insufficient
remedy against
mistakes
thus made. p.40

Return to Penit.
Act.


---page break---

35 Though the Contract plan were negligible for a Poorhouse, it wouldnot be for a Penit. house. p.41.

36 Difference 1. In the object the comfort his punishment. p.41

37 2. In the strength of the checks Then no publi, great publicity. p.42

38 3. In the sort of person likely to be chosed p.43

39 Inconsistency of Penit. Act. its inconsistency in giving most unsubted management to the Penit. Act when it gave interested to the Hulks. p. 45 Penit. HOuse 1. Affords almost attempt to

2. Went endure foreign regulation

3. Wants no official & paid inspection

4. Peculiarly open to inspection. Hulks contain

3g(a) Compbile - his management - a Bush




Identifier: | JB/157/041/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 157.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-27, 27a, 27b, 28-39, 39a

Box

157

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

contract contents

Image

003

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53411

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in