JB/137/082/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/082/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1819 Dec 6</p>
<head>1819 Dec 6<lb/>
Radicalism not dangerous</head>


<p>Radicalism not dangerous</p>
<note>Ireland<lb/>
<note>Ireland<lb/>
Va<gap/><lb/>
Vague<lb/>
1. Unauthori<gap/> occupation<lb/>
II. Unauthoritative accusations<lb/>
the Sp<gap/> <gap/><lb/>
III. <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
accusation</note><lb/>
accusation</note>


<p>In the case of the i<del>nferen</del><add>conclusion</add> thus here in question the conclusion<lb/>
<p>In the case of the <del>inference</del> <add>conclusion</add> thus here in question the conclusion<lb/>
<del>of <gap/></del> <add><del>inability</del></add> by which inability or inform <gap/> feasance<lb/>
<del>of <gap/></del> <add><del>inability</del></add> by which inability is inferred from non-feasance<lb/>
inability of the part of the side to afford <gap/> <add>and <gap/></add> argument inferred<lb/>
inability of the part of the side to afford rational <add>and <gap/></add> argument inferred<lb/>
from the non-production of and argument by the individual <lb/>
from the non-production of such argument by the individual<lb/>
in question, the cogency of the inference in or the direct ratio<lb/>
in question, the cogency of the inference in or the direct ratio<lb/>
of the known talent of that same individual: and with<lb/>
of the known talent of that same individual: and with<lb/>
Line 37: Line 37:
stood till lately.</p>
stood till lately.</p>


<p>But of late the <del>objections</del><add>aversion to the <add>proposed</add></add><add>change in question</add>to it have given itself<lb/>
<p>But of late the <del>objections</del> <add>aversion to the proposed</add> <add>change in question</add> to it have given itself<lb/>
vent an objection of a more determinate shape</p>
vent an objection of a more determinate shape</p>


<p><del>Of</del> <add>In</add> radical reform is viewed as an effect of which <lb/>
<p><del>Of</del> <add>In</add> radical reform is viewed as an effect of which <lb/>
with greater or less certainty<add>assurance</add> it is viewed as pregnant a<lb/>
with greater or less certainty <add>assurance</add> it is viewed as pregnant a<lb/>
general distinction of property: whether from a <add>some</add> proposed<lb/>
general distinction of property: whether from a <add>some</add> proposed<lb/>
scheme of equal division appeared to be <add>in the</add> <unclear>contemplitude</unclear> <lb/>
scheme of equal division appeared to be <add>in the</add> <unclear>contemplitude</unclear> <lb/>
of reformists or from it is not ex<gap/> and what<lb/>
of reformists or from it is not exactly said what<lb/>
other cause.</p>
other cause.</p>


<note><add><gap/></add> For the probability<lb/>
<note><add><gap/></add> For the probability<lb/>
of this result no reason<lb/>
of this result no reason<lb/>
is assigned. Yet this<lb/>
is assigned. Yet this<lb/>
mere assertion of a<lb/>
mere assertion of a<lb/>
connection in the<lb/>
connection in the<lb/>
Line 59: Line 59:


<p>In this instance it is true as in every other what<lb/>
<p>In this instance it is true as in every other what<lb/>
is asserted is taken for <gap/> assumed an instance without<lb/>
is asserted is taken for granted &#x2014; assumed an instance without<lb/>
so much as an attempt to give<add>produce</add> a reason why it should<lb/>
so much as an attempt to give <add>produce</add> a reason why it should<lb/>
be regarded in that light. <unclear>This</unclear> however though without<lb/>
be regarded in that light. Here however though without<lb/>
proof or attempt <add>so much as</add> at proof we have something determinate <lb/>
proof or attempt <add>so much as</add> at proof we have something determinate <lb/>
in the shape of the assertion have been found. Thus far<lb/>
in the shape of the assertion has been found. Thus far<lb/>
the first time or a something <add>that presents</add> presenting itself in what<lb/>
the first time or a something <add>that presents</add> presenting itself in what<lb/>
is called a tangible shape. <del>Here</del> This is a something<lb/>
is called a tangible shape. <del>Here</del> This is a something<lb/>
what in its nature is capable of being taken hold of:<lb/>
what in its nature is capable of being taken hold of:<lb/>
and taken hold of it shall accordingly be. Of this <lb/>
and taken hold of it shall accordingly be. Of this <lb/>
little trust the business <add>object</add> is to take hold of it and by<lb/>
little trust the business <add>object</add> is to take hold of it and by<lb/>
sifting it to the <gap/> shew the impartial reader of any such <note>portion is to be found<lb/>
sifting it to the bottom shew the impartial reader of any such <note>portion is to be found<lb/>
what it is worth - the impartial reader of peradventure any such person is to be found</note>
what it is worth &#x2014; the impartial reader if peradventure any such person is to be found</note></p>


</p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:45, 17 October 2019

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec 6
Radicalism not dangerous

Ireland
Vague
II. Unauthoritative accusations
III.
accusation

In the case of the inference conclusion thus here in question the conclusion
of inability by which inability is inferred from non-feasance
inability of the part of the side to afford rational and argument inferred
from the non-production of such argument by the individual
in question, the cogency of the inference in or the direct ratio
of the known talent of that same individual: and with
the concluding observation shall here conclude.

15
Thus till lately the
footing of the question
as usefulness of
radicalism
Of late more determinate
the objections. Effect assigned to it
destructive of property
from equal division
scheme or some
inefficient cause

Thus much as to the footing in which the question
of the usefulness of radical reform appears to have generally
stood till lately.

But of late the objections aversion to the proposed change in question to it have given itself
vent an objection of a more determinate shape

Of In radical reform is viewed as an effect of which
with greater or less certainty assurance it is viewed as pregnant a
general distinction of property: whether from a some proposed
scheme of equal division appeared to be in the contemplitude
of reformists or from it is not exactly said what
other cause.

For the probability
of this result no reason
is assigned. Yet this
mere assertion of a
connection in the
way of causality
affords a tangible
reason, which as
such shall here be laid
hold of.

In this instance it is true as in every other what
is asserted is taken for granted — assumed an instance without
so much as an attempt to give produce a reason why it should
be regarded in that light. Here however though without
proof or attempt so much as at proof we have something determinate
in the shape of the assertion has been found. Thus far
the first time or a something that presents presenting itself in what
is called a tangible shape. Here This is a something
what in its nature is capable of being taken hold of:
and taken hold of it shall accordingly be. Of this
little trust the business object is to take hold of it and by
sifting it to the bottom shew the impartial reader of any such portion is to be found
what it is worth — the impartial reader if peradventure any such person is to be found



Identifier: | JB/137/082/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

14-16

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

082

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46799

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in