JB/135/251/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/135/251/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 June 26<lb/>
Posology Alegomorphics</head>
 
<note>Alegomorphics<lb/>
56</note>
 
<p>Question. or 1 In what do the operations performed<lb/>
upon fractions, vulgar and decimal, agree with<lb/>
and in what do they differ from, the two radical operations,<lb/>
namely <hi rend="underline">addition</hi> and <hi rend="underline"><sic>substraction</sic></hi>, and those others<lb/>
abovementioned? and first as to vulgar fractions?</p>
 
<p>Answer. In so far as the subject of the<lb/>
alteration is the sort of fraction called a <hi rend="underline">vulgar fraction</hi>,<lb/>
antecedently to any further operation the operations of<lb/>
multiplication and division are considered as performed:<lb/>
in the first place multiplication, in the second place division.</p>
 
<p>Question. or 2 What is the subject of the multiplication<lb/>
considered as performed?</p>
 
<p>Answer. It is any quantity whatsoever<lb/>
of which it being considered a whole, not the whole<lb/>
but only a certain number of its parts are, for the purpose<lb/>
in question, to be taken. This whole being a unit<lb/>
is, in the first place, with a view to its being divided, multiplied<lb/>
by the number of expressive of the parts of which<lb/>
a certain number may without further division, be,<lb/>
it is supposed, sufficient for the purpose.</p>
 
<p>Question. or 3 Give an example.</p>
 
<p>Answer, Suppose that to guide my pen,<lb/>
in the describing of a circle, having a stick, which I<lb/>
am told is a foot in length, it appears to me that a<lb/>
portion of it, if exactly marked out, would be more<lb/>
convenient than the whole: a portion somewhat less<lb/>
than half the length of it. Dividing it as nearly<lb/>
as I can into twelve equal parts, I mark them upon<lb/>
the stick in the first place. Here then to obtain the<lb/>
twelve, being the number of which I want no more<lb/>
than a part, I multiply <add>number one which is the number belonging to the whole</add> by the number twelve. When<lb/>
these twelve parts thus marked out lie before me,<lb/>
it seems to me that few of them will be sufficient<lb/>
for my purpose. I then say that not the whole of the<lb/>
stick but five twelfths of it will be the quantity best<lb/>
adapted to my purpose. In this way I obtain the sort<lb/>
of number called <hi rend="underline">a fractional number</hi>.</p>
 
<p>&#9758; <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether a fraction with a smaller denomination<lb/>
might not be employed as an example, to more advantage?</p>





Revision as of 08:39, 5 November 2019

Click Here To Edit

1820 June 26
Posology Alegomorphics

Alegomorphics
56

Question. or 1 In what do the operations performed
upon fractions, vulgar and decimal, agree with
and in what do they differ from, the two radical operations,
namely addition and substraction, and those others
abovementioned? and first as to vulgar fractions?

Answer. In so far as the subject of the
alteration is the sort of fraction called a vulgar fraction,
antecedently to any further operation the operations of
multiplication and division are considered as performed:
in the first place multiplication, in the second place division.

Question. or 2 What is the subject of the multiplication
considered as performed?

Answer. It is any quantity whatsoever
of which it being considered a whole, not the whole
but only a certain number of its parts are, for the purpose
in question, to be taken. This whole being a unit
is, in the first place, with a view to its being divided, multiplied
by the number of expressive of the parts of which
a certain number may without further division, be,
it is supposed, sufficient for the purpose.

Question. or 3 Give an example.

Answer, Suppose that to guide my pen,
in the describing of a circle, having a stick, which I
am told is a foot in length, it appears to me that a
portion of it, if exactly marked out, would be more
convenient than the whole: a portion somewhat less
than half the length of it. Dividing it as nearly
as I can into twelve equal parts, I mark them upon
the stick in the first place. Here then to obtain the
twelve, being the number of which I want no more
than a part, I multiply number one which is the number belonging to the whole by the number twelve. When
these twelve parts thus marked out lie before me,
it seems to me that few of them will be sufficient
for my purpose. I then say that not the whole of the
stick but five twelfths of it will be the quantity best
adapted to my purpose. In this way I obtain the sort
of number called a fractional number.

Quere whether a fraction with a smaller denomination
might not be employed as an example, to more advantage?




Identifier: | JB/135/251/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1820-06-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 7

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

251

Info in main headings field

posology alegomorphic

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

g56 / / g59 /

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

46369

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in