★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
of property.<lb/> | of property.<lb/> | ||
</note><lb/> | </note><lb/> | ||
<p>Taking the two speeches together, here then are two<lb/> | |||
<del>ends</del> evil designs<add>intention</add> charged: charged in the same class of person,<lb/> | |||
<add>namely <del>the</del><add>all</add></add><add> reformist: meaning or at the least including all radical reformists. </add></p> | |||
<p>In the July Speech the design is the <hi rend="underline">subversion of the</hi> <lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">"constitution: that</hi> design and no other.</p> | |||
<p>In the November Speech it is the subversion of <lb/> | |||
"the rights of property."</p> | |||
<p>Of The design first charged the description give<lb/> | |||
has no determinate meaning. Accordingly no <unclear>uncertain</unclear><lb/> | |||
would have law been made of it, but for the <add>intimate</add> connection<lb/> | |||
between the <add><del><gap/></del></add> speech by which this accusation is <unclear>conveyed</unclear><lb/> | |||
and the <add>other</add> speech by which the other accusation is conveyed.</p> | |||
<note>12 or 2<lb/> | <note>12 or 2<lb/> | ||
Line 26: | Line 42: | ||
designated in the two<lb/> | designated in the two<lb/> | ||
speeches</note><lb/> | speeches</note><lb/> | ||
In defending the design <add>in question</add> the radicalists against<lb/> | |||
the accusations<add>imputation</add> that have <add>they</add> been cast upon it, it <add>was</add> seemed<lb/> | |||
1819 Dec. 21 Radicalism not dangerous
1. &c
§.2. Speeches Nov
11 or 1
Cher
1. In July Speech
subversive of the
2. In November Speech
subversion of rights
of property.
Taking the two speeches together, here then are two
ends evil designsintention charged: charged in the same class of person,
namely the<add>all</add> reformist: meaning or at the least including all radical reformists.
In the July Speech the design is the subversion of the
"constitution: that design and no other.
In the November Speech it is the subversion of
"the rights of property."
Of The design first charged the description give
has no determinate meaning. Accordingly no uncertain
would have law been made of it, but for the intimate connection
between the speech by which this accusation is conveyed
and the other speech by which the other accusation is conveyed.
12 or 2
Subversion of the<
Constitution has no
precise meaning:
would not have been
mentioned but for
the identity of the persons
designated in the two
speeches
In defending the design in question the radicalists against
the accusationsimputation that have they been cast upon it, it was seemed
13 or 3
In the defence found
necessary to add
to subversive of
rights of property
des of preponderant evil in
every shape . defence
otherwise insufficient
Identifier: | JB/137/094/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1819-12-21 |
11 or 1 - 13 or 3 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
094 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 / e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1818 |
|||
46811 |
|||