JB/157/042/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/157/042/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:
p.5</p><pb/>
p.5</p><pb/>


Publi. 1<gap/> Security
<p>Publi. 1<hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi> Security</p>
 
<p>1 Arts 1, 6, 7.</p>
<p>Good behaviour<lb/>
inference given<lb/>
of it in his plan<lb/>
Remaining not<lb/>
probable. p.1. 4<lb/>
III. 6</p>
<p><!-- in pencil -->7</p>
<p>2 Art.1</p>
<p>Except in case<lb/>
of a Remanent<lb/>
parishless as well<lb/>
as helpless. p 2</p>
<p><!-- in pencil -->8</p>
<p>3 Art. 5</p>
<p>Security why expended<lb/>
to subsistence<lb/>
as well as good behaviour.<lb/>
p.3</p>
<p><!-- in pencil -->9</p>
<p>4 Art. 6</p>
<p>Governor why made<lb/>
responsible in failure<lb/>
os the private Bondsman<lb/>
p. 5</p>
<p>Forgive him &#x2014;</p>
<p>1. Inducement to<lb/>
oppose irresponsible<lb/>
Bondsman.</p>
<p>2. Plan of self-preservation<lb/>
for <del>un<gap/>ing</del><lb/>
taking<lb/>
upon him <del><gap/></del> so<lb/>
invidious a task. <note>N.B. What <add>the <gap/></add> would<lb/>
much it particularly<lb/>
invidious<lb/>
<del>they would be his</del><add>such then he would</add><lb/>
have so many <lb/>
competitors</note></p>
<p>3. Interest in the<lb/>
through a lasting<lb/>
reformation</p>
<p><!-- in pencil -->10</p>
<p>5 Art. 6</p>
<p>Probability of his<lb/>
<del>submitting</del><add>taking on him</add><lb/>
this risk &amp; on<lb/>
what terms. p.6</p><pb/>
 
I <gap/>
5(a) Art.1.
Penalty to go in
the shape of use
in demonification
too the party insured.
p.8
12 <gap/>
<gap/> 6 Art.9
Bandsmans recognizance
why
renewable at short
period. p.9.
 
1. To <gap/>
strengthen the the
security for obligation to good
behabiour
 
2. To increase the
<gap/> of finding
Bondsmen.
<gap/>


1 Arts 1, 6, 7.
Good behaviourinference given
of it in his plan
Remaining not
probable. p.1. 4
III. 6
7
2 Art.1
Except in case
of a Remanent
parishship as well
as helpless. p 2
8
3 Art. 5
Security why expended
to subsistence
as well as good behaviour.
p.3
9
4 Art. 6
Governor why made
responsible on failure
os the private Bondsman
p. 5
Forgive him -
1. Inducement to
oppose irresponsible
Bondsman.
2. Plan of self -preservation
for <del>un<gap/></del>
taking
upon him <del><gap/></del> so
invidious a task.
3. Interest in the
through a lasting
reformation
10
5 Art. 6
Probability of his
<del>submitting</del><add>taking on him</add>
this risk &amp; on
what terms. p.6





Revision as of 09:35, 14 November 2019

Click Here To Edit

Post-Interest
Strong Powers

Art. 2

The stronger the powers
given to the Bondsman
the stronger his security
and the stronger a
main inducement
to become Bound a Bondsman:
the greater
therefore the probability
of finding
one Whoever
from pure affection
& without view of
present advantage
might be disposed would choose to
to render
such a service -
of a father, an
uncle a brother
a patron will be
still at liberty


Art 1

3,4,5, 6,7
12, 14,15,,16,17
18,21,22, 23,
24,25,27,28 29,
31,32,33,34

Art. 2

19, 12, 26


Art 4

24,25


Art.5

8.

Art.6

6, 10 |


Art 7 |

6 |

Art 8

12 1 |

Art. 9

5 18 |


Art.13

27 30


---page break---

I

1 Art.

1

A subsidiary
Panopticon, an
establishment here supposed
and favoured.
p.1.

2

2.Art.1.

Governor why not
to be bound to retain
the Remnants at
a reduced price.p.3

3

3 Art.1

Governor why preferable
to private
Bondsman p.4.

4

4 Art.1

The advantage of
pre-inception necessary
to his setting
up such as establishment.
p.4.

5

5 Art 1

Care taken not to
destroy theall competition.
p.5


---page break---

Publi. 1 Security

1 Arts 1, 6, 7.

Good behaviour
inference given
of it in his plan
Remaining not
probable. p.1. 4
III. 6

7

2 Art.1

Except in case
of a Remanent
parishless as well
as helpless. p 2

8

3 Art. 5

Security why expended
to subsistence
as well as good behaviour.
p.3

9

4 Art. 6

Governor why made
responsible in failure
os the private Bondsman
p. 5

Forgive him —

1. Inducement to
oppose irresponsible
Bondsman.

2. Plan of self-preservation
for uning
taking
upon him so
invidious a task. N.B. What the would
much it particularly
invidious
they would be hissuch then he would
have so many
competitors

3. Interest in the
through a lasting
reformation

10

5 Art. 6

Probability of his
submittingtaking on him
this risk & on
what terms. p.6


---page break---

I 5(a) Art.1. Penalty to go in the shape of use in demonification too the party insured. p.8 12 6 Art.9 Bandsmans recognizance why renewable at short period. p.9.

1. To strengthen the the security for obligation to good behabiour

2. To increase the of finding Bondsmen.





Identifier: | JB/157/042/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 157.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

157

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

042a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Info in main headings field

this side cancelled

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53412

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in