JB/004/044/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/044/002: Difference between revisions

Annieb2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Annieb2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
<p>
<p>
Then, if a cheaper court was established, having concurrent jurisdiction with the<lb/>
Then, if a cheaper court was established, having concurrent jurisdiction with the<lb/>
Marshalsea court up to 10l. it would very much  diminish the business of the Marshalsea<p>
Marshalsea court up to 10 l. it would very much  diminish the business of the Marshalsea<lb/>
court? &#x2014; In my opinion it would</p>
court? &#x2014; In my opinion it would</p>


<p>
<p>
What is the sum which you gave the purchase of a right of pleading in that<lb/>
What is the sum which you gave the purchase of a right of pleading in that<lb/>
court? &#x2014; I gave 2,000l,; two men in the court have since given more. <lb/>
court? &#x2014; I gave 2,000 l,; two men in the court have since given more. <lb/>
</p>
</p>


<p>
Is the business pretty equally divided between the counsel, in that court? &#x2014; The<lb/>
business is of two description, the defended causes, and the writs of inquiry, where<lb/>
there is no defence; in the defended causes all the four counsel are usually employed, <lb/>
in the undefended ones only two<lb/>
</p>


<p>
Then, in the undefended causes, is the business pretty equally divided among the<lb/>
four, or are there two that would be considered the leading counsel, that get more <lb/>
business than the others? &#x2014; In the undefended causes the business is equally divided <lb/>
among the junior counsel, and unequally among the senior.
</p>




</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 20:52, 19 November 2019

Click Here To Edit

20 MINUTES OF EVIDENCE BEFORE SELECT COMMITTEE

William Earl,
Esq,
}
22 February,
1825,

judgment, his costs amount to about 10l. and the defendants' costs to 9l.; therefore
the defendant losing the verdicts pays 10l. to the plaintiff, and somewhere about 9l.
for his own expenses.

Then, if a cheaper court was established, having concurrent jurisdiction with the
Marshalsea court up to 10 l. it would very much diminish the business of the Marshalsea
court? — In my opinion it would

What is the sum which you gave the purchase of a right of pleading in that
court? — I gave 2,000 l,; two men in the court have since given more.

Is the business pretty equally divided between the counsel, in that court? — The
business is of two description, the defended causes, and the writs of inquiry, where
there is no defence; in the defended causes all the four counsel are usually employed,
in the undefended ones only two

Then, in the undefended causes, is the business pretty equally divided among the
four, or are there two that would be considered the leading counsel, that get more
business than the others? — In the undefended causes the business is equally divided
among the junior counsel, and unequally among the senior.




Identifier: | JB/004/044/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1825-05-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

044

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

county courts bill / minutes of evidence / taken before the select committee on the / bill / for preventing delays and expenses in the proceedings of county courts, and for the more easy and speedy recovery of small debts, in england and wales

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

36

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(6-35)

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1965

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in