★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1831 March 10 M 5 | |||
Posology | |||
Introduction | |||
Place of Posology in | |||
Art-and-Science | |||
1 | |||
§. Place of Posology in the field of art and science | |||
This paragraph has been deleted | |||
Body and mind Bodies and minds under the one is the other of these | |||
By these two appellations are designated and distinguished | |||
two classes two subject matters the two classes or say aggregates of consideration under within one or | |||
other of what every | |||
or 1 | |||
Beings are | |||
1. Matter, | |||
2. Mind | |||
Matter and mind — appellations then by one | |||
or other of which all beings are wont in use to be designated | |||
or 2 | |||
Per some, to the sign | |||
mind corresponds | |||
no being signified | |||
An opinion entertained by some thinking <gap/> is | |||
that to the appellation mind sign composed of the work | |||
mind there exists not any subject matter signified | |||
or 3 | |||
Per them, sole beings | |||
bodies, of which some | |||
have properties the aggregate | |||
of which is | |||
mind; others, not. | |||
According to them is but by the word body is designated | |||
whatsoever has existence. But of bodies some there are in which | |||
may be observed and distinguished certain properties for the designation of to the aggregate | |||
of which the term mind is wont to be employed; | |||
other bodies others there are in which no such properties have been | |||
observed | |||
If the one For 1 conception be the correct one, beings are either | |||
bodies or minds will be the proper proportion, if the other, bodies | |||
are either endued or unendued or endued with mind | |||
4 | |||
Which conception is | |||
correct belongs not to | |||
the design of this | |||
work to enquire | |||
Sole reason for mentioning | |||
it, fear lest a | |||
<gap/> reader should suppose | |||
that truth as to | |||
matters belonging to | |||
posology <gap/> depend | |||
upon this | |||
Which of these opposite opinions be the correct one — and | |||
the one or the other of them will it any rate be the correct one — it belongs | |||
not to the design of the present work to enquire. The only reason for | |||
thus bringing the second to view is — the appellation has by some | |||
the first opinion thus held up to view a false one accord in the view of the matter the truth as whatsoever comes after it | |||
should be regarded as depending on it, and will therefore be | |||
found erroneous and uninstructive. | |||
1831 March 10 M 5 Posology
Introduction Place of Posology in Art-and-Science
1
§. Place of Posology in the field of art and science
This paragraph has been deleted Body and mind Bodies and minds under the one is the other of these By these two appellations are designated and distinguished two classes two subject matters the two classes or say aggregates of consideration under within one or other of what every
or 1 Beings are 1. Matter, 2. Mind
Matter and mind — appellations then by one or other of which all beings are wont in use to be designated
or 2 Per some, to the sign mind corresponds no being signified
An opinion entertained by some thinking is that to the appellation mind sign composed of the work mind there exists not any subject matter signified
or 3 Per them, sole beings bodies, of which some have properties the aggregate of which is mind; others, not.
According to them is but by the word body is designated whatsoever has existence. But of bodies some there are in which may be observed and distinguished certain properties for the designation of to the aggregate of which the term mind is wont to be employed; other bodies others there are in which no such properties have been observed
If the one For 1 conception be the correct one, beings are either bodies or minds will be the proper proportion, if the other, bodies are either endued or unendued or endued with mind
4 Which conception is correct belongs not to the design of this work to enquire Sole reason for mentioning it, fear lest a reader should suppose that truth as to matters belonging to posology depend upon this
Which of these opposite opinions be the correct one — and the one or the other of them will it any rate be the correct one — it belongs not to the design of the present work to enquire. The only reason for thus bringing the second to view is — the appellation has by some the first opinion thus held up to view a false one accord in the view of the matter the truth as whatsoever comes after it should be regarded as depending on it, and will therefore be found erroneous and uninstructive.
Identifier: | JB/135/319/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1831-03-10 |
or 1 - or 3, 4 |
||
135 |
posology |
||
319 |
posology |
||
001 |
place of posology in the field of art and science |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d5 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
street & co 1830 |
||
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
1830 |
|||
46437 |
|||