JB/135/319/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/319/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1831 March 10 M 5
Posology
 
Introduction
Place of Posology in
Art-and-Science
 
1
 
&sect;. Place of Posology in the field of art and science
 
This paragraph has been deleted
Body and mind Bodies and minds under the one is the other of these
By these two appellations are designated and distinguished
two classes two subject matters the two classes or say aggregates of consideration under within one or
other of what every
 
or 1
Beings are
1. Matter,
2. Mind
 
Matter and mind &#x2014; appellations then by one
or other of which all beings are wont in use to be designated
 
or 2
Per some, to the sign
mind corresponds
no being signified
 
An opinion entertained by some thinking <gap/> is
that to the appellation mind sign composed of the work
mind there exists not any subject matter signified
 
or 3
Per them, sole beings
bodies, of which some
have properties the aggregate
of which is
mind; others, not.
 
According to them is but by the word body is designated
whatsoever has existence. But of bodies some there are in which
may be observed and distinguished certain properties for the designation of to the aggregate
of which the term mind is wont to be employed;
other bodies others there are in which no such properties have been
observed
 
If the one For 1 conception be the correct one, beings are either
bodies or minds will be the proper proportion, if the other, bodies
are either endued or unendued or endued with mind
 
4
Which conception is
correct belongs not to
the design of this
work to enquire
Sole reason for mentioning
it, fear lest a
<gap/> reader should suppose
that truth as to
matters belonging to
posology <gap/> depend
upon this
 
Which of these opposite opinions be the correct one &#x2014; and
the one or the other of them will it any rate be the correct one &#x2014; it belongs
not to the design of the present work to enquire. The only reason for
thus bringing the second to view is &#x2014; the appellation has by some
the first opinion thus held up to view a false one accord in the view of the matter the truth as whatsoever comes after it
should be regarded as depending on it, and will therefore be
found erroneous and uninstructive.





Revision as of 08:35, 24 December 2019

Click Here To Edit

1831 March 10 M 5 Posology

Introduction Place of Posology in Art-and-Science

1

§. Place of Posology in the field of art and science

This paragraph has been deleted Body and mind Bodies and minds under the one is the other of these By these two appellations are designated and distinguished two classes two subject matters the two classes or say aggregates of consideration under within one or other of what every

or 1 Beings are 1. Matter, 2. Mind

Matter and mind — appellations then by one or other of which all beings are wont in use to be designated

or 2 Per some, to the sign mind corresponds no being signified

An opinion entertained by some thinking is that to the appellation mind sign composed of the work mind there exists not any subject matter signified

or 3 Per them, sole beings bodies, of which some have properties the aggregate of which is mind; others, not.

According to them is but by the word body is designated whatsoever has existence. But of bodies some there are in which may be observed and distinguished certain properties for the designation of to the aggregate of which the term mind is wont to be employed; other bodies others there are in which no such properties have been observed

If the one For 1 conception be the correct one, beings are either bodies or minds will be the proper proportion, if the other, bodies are either endued or unendued or endued with mind

4 Which conception is correct belongs not to the design of this work to enquire Sole reason for mentioning it, fear lest a reader should suppose that truth as to matters belonging to posology depend upon this

Which of these opposite opinions be the correct one — and the one or the other of them will it any rate be the correct one — it belongs not to the design of the present work to enquire. The only reason for thus bringing the second to view is — the appellation has by some the first opinion thus held up to view a false one accord in the view of the matter the truth as whatsoever comes after it should be regarded as depending on it, and will therefore be found erroneous and uninstructive.




Identifier: | JB/135/319/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 3, 4

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

319

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

place of posology in the field of art and science

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

46437

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in