JB/135/326/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/326/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1831 May 11 M 12<lb/>
Posology</head>
 
<note>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>
Introduction<lb/>
1. Alegomorphics.<lb/>
&sect; 4. Formation of Alegomorphics<lb/>
2. Equivalents &#x2014; indication of<lb/>
1. Order of augmentation</note>
 
<p>2 5</p>
 
<!-- This page has been struck out, down to "17 or 5" -->
<p>Of the operation <sic>stiled</sic> <hi rend="underline">multiplication</hi> now come various<lb/>
modes or say modifications, still succeeding one in the order<lb/>
of <gap/> or say augmentation or say <hi rend="underline"><sic>encrease</sic></hi></p>
 
<note>1. Squaring.</note>
 
<p>1. First comes <hi rend="underline">squaring</hi>. Of this word <add>term</add> mention is made<lb/>
for the sake of analogy: though, as applied to <hi rend="underline">Alegomorphics</hi><lb/>
scarcely is <del>it in use <add>matters</add></del>: this form of a <hi rend="underline">verb</hi> with its <hi rend="underline">participle</hi><lb/>
is it in uses That which <hi rend="underline">is</hi> in use is the <add>noun</add> substantive,<lb/>
indication of the products of this same operation, namely<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">square</hi> of meaning <add>that is to say</add> the square of the number multiplied</p>
<!-- Horizontal line -->
 
<note>17 or 5<lb/>
Where abbreviation is<lb/>
there equivalence is<lb/>
But, in posology &#x2014;<lb/>
in alegomorphics, &#x2014;<lb/>
of abbreviation the<lb/>
nature, or at least<lb/>
result is not the<lb/>
same as in ordinary<lb/>
discourse. In posology<lb/>
In posology, the<lb/>
thing signified is <del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del><lb/>
notion abbreviated, <unclear>whereas</unclear><lb/>
in ordinary discourse, <hi rend="underline">equivalent</hi><lb/>
only</note>
 
<p>17 or 5 In a word in every case where abbreviation has place<lb/>
<del>exhibition</del> <add>statement</add> of equivalence has place. For <del>equivalence</del> <add>abbreviation</add> in posology<lb/>
in general, and in alegomorphics in particular, abbreviation is<lb/>
not exactly the same operation we in ordinary discourse: at any<lb/>
rate the result is not the same. In the case of alegomorphics,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> it is one and the same quantity that has place in <add>thing one and the same thing signified</add><lb/>
the two instances: it is between the signs &#x2014; between each of the signs<lb/>
and the other that the equivalence has place: and that equivalence is<lb/>
<sic>compleat</sic>: whereas in case of abbreviation, <del><gap/></del> howsoever <add>completely</add> equivalent<lb/>
to each other may be the two expressions <add><unclear>when the</unclear></add> &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> <unclear>question</unclear> namely<lb/>
the expression at length and the expression which is the abridgment<lb/>
of it <del>no such</del> between the import of these two sets of signs no<lb/>
such complete equivalence no such <hi rend="underline">identity</hi> has place.</p>
 
<note>18 or 6<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Not</hi> wherever equivalence<lb/>
has place, <add>so</add> has abbreviation<lb/>
Example. Between <del>two</del> <hi rend="underline"><add>three</add></hi> and<lb/>
<del>two</del> <add>three</add>, and <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>three times <hi rend="underline">two</hi></add><lb/>
equivalence has place;<lb/>
abbreviation, <del><gap/></del> not.</note>
 
<p>18 or 6 Nor is it true that, whereas equivalence has place<lb/>
abbreviation has place Example &#x2014; Between two and two on the <del>other</del> one<lb/>
part <add>hand</add> and twice two on the other equivalence has place, but no abbreviation<lb/>
has place</p>





Revision as of 08:49, 31 December 2019

Click Here To Edit

1831 May 11 M 12
Posology

ulto
Introduction
1. Alegomorphics.
§ 4. Formation of Alegomorphics
2. Equivalents — indication of
1. Order of augmentation

2 5

Of the operation stiled multiplication now come various
modes or say modifications, still succeeding one in the order
of or say augmentation or say encrease

1. Squaring.

1. First comes squaring. Of this word term mention is made
for the sake of analogy: though, as applied to Alegomorphics
scarcely is it in use matters: this form of a verb with its participle
is it in uses That which is in use is the noun substantive,
indication of the products of this same operation, namely
the square of meaning that is to say the square of the number multiplied

17 or 5
Where abbreviation is
there equivalence is
But, in posology —
in alegomorphics, —
of abbreviation the
nature, or at least
result is not the
same as in ordinary
discourse. In posology
In posology, the
thing signified is
notion abbreviated, whereas
in ordinary discourse, equivalent
only

17 or 5 In a word in every case where abbreviation has place
exhibition statement of equivalence has place. For equivalence abbreviation in posology
in general, and in alegomorphics in particular, abbreviation is
not exactly the same operation we in ordinary discourse: at any
rate the result is not the same. In the case of alegomorphics,
it is one and the same quantity that has place in thing one and the same thing signified
the two instances: it is between the signs — between each of the signs
and the other that the equivalence has place: and that equivalence is
compleat: whereas in case of abbreviation, howsoever completely equivalent
to each other may be the two expressions when the question namely
the expression at length and the expression which is the abridgment
of it no such between the import of these two sets of signs no
such complete equivalence no such identity has place.

18 or 6
Not wherever equivalence
has place, so has abbreviation
Example. Between two three and
two three, and three times two
equivalence has place;
abbreviation, not.

18 or 6 Nor is it true that, whereas equivalence has place
abbreviation has place Example — Between two and two on the other one
part hand and twice two on the other equivalence has place, but no abbreviation
has place




Identifier: | JB/135/326/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-05-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

17 or 5 - 18 or 6

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

326

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d12 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

46444

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in