JB/137/106/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/106/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1819 Dec 23</head>
<head>1819 Dec 23</head>
<p>Radicalism not dangerous</p>
<p>VIII Radicalism not dangerous</p>
<note>II Nature of the case<lb/>
<note>II Nature of the case<lb/>
I &sect;.2. Immoveables</note><lb/>
I &sect;.2. Immoveables</note><lb/>


<p>&sect;.2. In equal shares, Partition of immoveables impossibles</p>
<p>&sect;.2. In equal shares, Partition of immoveables impossible.</p>
<p><del>In the</del> Under the last <del>period</del> <add><del>in <gap/> general view</del><add>in general <del><gap/></del><add>anticipation</add>was given of a multitude of operations<lb/>
<p><del>In the</del> Under the last <del>period</del> <add><del>in <gap/> general view</del><add>head a general <del><gap/></del><add>anticipation</add>was given of a multitude of operations<lb/>
each of them in the<lb/>
each of them in the<lb/>
nature of things  impossible</add></add> <del>the list of the <gap/> possibility</del> <add><del>impossible</del></add><lb/>
nature of things  impossible</add></add> <del>the list of the <gap/> possibilities</del> <lb/>
<del>the proof proof of which has  been the exp<del>⧼toolbar-peri-deletion⧽</del>ected <gap/>ment</del><add>of these operations the accomplishment of  <del><gap/> expectation</del> which is <add>however</add> by</add><lb/>
<add><del>impossible</del></add><lb/>
<del>of which  has been assumed to be <gap/>tion and entertained by</del><add>the charge, asserted to have been regarded as feasibly <del><gap/></del>, and as such</add> <lb/>
<add>of these operations the accomplishment of  <del><gap/> expectation</del> which is <add>however</add> <add>by</add> <del>the proof proof of which has been the expected <gap/>ment</del><lb/>
<add>the charge, asserted to have been regarded as feasibly <del><gap/></del>, and as such</add><del>of which  has been assumed to be <gap/>tion and entertained by</del><lb/>
<add><gap/> resolved upon; resolved upon by</add> so many millions, and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> with <del><gap/> <gap/></del> such full assurance</p>
<add><gap/> resolved upon; resolved upon by</add> so many millions, and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> with <del><gap/> <gap/></del> such full assurance</p>


Line 21: Line 22:
of property, namely all the lands in three <add>United</add> kingdoms.<lb/>
of property, namely all the lands in three <add>United</add> kingdoms.<lb/>
not to speak of distant dependencies:- <del>in</del> <hi rend="underline">shares</hi><lb/>
not to speak of distant dependencies:- <del>in</del> <hi rend="underline">shares</hi><lb/>
<del>which</del> necessarily, in the first place, <add>were it only for conception and expression</add> supposed <hi rend="underline">equal</hi>.</p>
<del>which</del> necessarily, in the first place, <add>were it only for conception and expression sake</add> supposed <hi rend="underline">equal</hi>.</p>


<p><gap/> regard to the proportional number  of views the principle<lb/>
<p><unclear>In</unclear> regard to the proportional number  of views the principle<lb/>
being universal suffrage, let in in the first place <del>suppose</del><lb/>
being universal suffrage, let in in the first place <del>suppose</del><lb/>
for the numbers of the <add>intended</add> sharers take the <add>whole<add><del>in Great Britain</del></add></add> members of the inhabitants<lb/>
for the numbers of the <add>intended</add> sharers take the <add>whole<add><del>in Great Britain</del></add></add> members of the inhabitants<lb/>
Line 32: Line 33:
<p><del><gap/></del><add>As to</add> figures, we <add><del>shall take</del> are fortunate in being able to</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> this occasion do alter<gap/></del><lb/>
<p><del><gap/></del><add>As to</add> figures, we <add><del>shall take</del> are fortunate in being able to</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> this occasion do alter<gap/></del><lb/>
them take th<gap/> from the most authentic source: namely from<lb/>
them take th<gap/> from the most authentic source: namely from<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Mr Rickman's Preliminary Explanati</hi>ons to the Parliamentary <note>Population <del><hi rend="underline">Accounts</del><add>Returns</add></hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Mr Rickman's Preliminary Explanati</hi>ons to the <hi rend="underline">Parliamentary</hi> <note><hi rend="underline">Population <del>Accounts</del><add>Returns</add></hi></hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">of 1812</hi></note></p>
<hi rend="underline">of 1812</hi></note></p>


<p>In <hi rend="underline">Great Britain</hi>, number of <hi rend="underline">inhabitants</hi> <add>thence <del><gap/></del> of sharers,</add> as leave by<lb/>
<p>In <hi rend="underline">Great Britain</hi>, number of <hi rend="underline">inhabitants</hi> <add>thence <del><gap/></del> of sharers,</add> as have by<lb/>
the Parliamentary Relationship <add>themselves:</add> number of <hi rend="underline">acres</hi> to be shared,<lb/>
the Parliamentary Relationship <add>themselves:</add> number of <hi rend="underline">acres</hi> to be shared,<lb/>
by conjecture. In <hi rend="underline">Ireland</hi>, <del>number of acres, by long</del><lb/>
by conjecture. In <hi rend="underline">Ireland</hi>, <del>number of acres, by laws</del><lb/>
<del>estimate, one third of that the <gap/> <gap/> Great Britain</del><lb/>
<del>estimate, one third of that the <gap/> <gap/> Great Britain</del><lb/>
<add>proportion of the</add> number of inhabitants, thence of sharers, <del>not <gap/>ably</del> to<lb/>
<add>proportion of the</add> number of inhabitants, thence of sharers, <del>not <gap/>ably</del> to<lb/>
the number of acres, not assignably different from what<lb/>
the number of acres, not assignably different from what<lb/>
it is in Great Britain, number of acres by estimate, as<lb/>
it is in Great Britain, number of acres by estimate, as<lb/>
Mr <hi rend="underline">Rickman</hi>, one third of those in Great Britain: <add>those in England being two lands,</add> In <lb/>
per <hi rend="underline">Rickman</hi>, one third of those in Great Britain: <add>those in England being two lands,</add> In <lb/>
may accordingly, on this occasion be laid out of<lb/>
may accordingly, on this occasion be laid out of<lb/>
the case; and the proportion for <hi rend="underline">Great Britain</hi> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
the case; and the proportion for <hi rend="underline">Great Britain</hi> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
assumed <add>accordingly</add> as the proportion for the <hi rend="underline">whole</hi> of the United Kingdom.</p>
assumed <add>accordingly</add> as the proportion for the <hi rend="underline">whole</hi> of the United Kingdom. |</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:26, 11 January 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec 23

VIII Radicalism not dangerous

II Nature of the case
I §.2. Immoveables

§.2. In equal shares, Partition of immoveables impossible.

In the Under the last period in general view<add>head a general <add>anticipationwas given of a multitude of operations
each of them in the
nature of things impossible</add></add> the list of the possibilities
impossible
of these operations the accomplishment of expectation which is <add>however by the proof proof of which has been the expected ment
the charge, asserted to have been regarded as feasibly , and as suchof which has been assumed to be tion and entertained by
resolved upon; resolved upon by so many millions, and that with such full assurance

We come now to b bring them under view one by
one.

1. Operation the first Partition of immoveable subjects
of property, namely all the lands in three United kingdoms.
not to speak of distant dependencies:- in shares
which necessarily, in the first place, were it only for conception and expression sake supposed equal.

In regard to the proportional number of views the principle
being universal suffrage, let in in the first place suppose
for the numbers of the intended sharers take the whole<add>in Great Britain</add> members of the inhabitants
of Great B the three kingdoms: this by this same number but let
us shall divide the whole number of acres in thethese same three
kingdoms.

As to figures, we shall take are fortunate in being able to this occasion do alter
them take th from the most authentic source: namely from
Mr Rickman's Preliminary Explanations to the Parliamentary Population AccountsReturns</hi>
of 1812

In Great Britain, number of inhabitants thence of sharers, as have by
the Parliamentary Relationship themselves: number of acres to be shared,
by conjecture. In Ireland, number of acres, by laws
estimate, one third of that the Great Britain
proportion of the number of inhabitants, thence of sharers, not ably to
the number of acres, not assignably different from what
it is in Great Britain, number of acres by estimate, as
per Rickman, one third of those in Great Britain: those in England being two lands, In
may accordingly, on this occasion be laid out of
the case; and the proportion for Great Britain
assumed accordingly as the proportion for the whole of the United Kingdom. |



Identifier: | JB/137/106/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46823

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in