JB/137/229/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/229/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 9</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Radicalism not dangerous<lb/> (2) 2 <note>Bill of Rights abrogated</note></p> <p>In the next place, <del>in</del> full liberty <add>mutual and universal</add> for the communication<lb/>of facts and sentiments.  <del>On the point of the l</del> To each House<lb/>of Parliament, <del>liberty of express</del> unrestricted liberty of <del>discourse</del><lb/>communicating whatsoever they thought fit to the body of the<lb/>people.  To the body of the people like liberty of communicating<lb/>whatsoever they thought fit to one another.</p> <p><del>A</del>One condition <add>requisite</add> was still wanting as all these liberties<lb/>though enjoyed in their utmost extent would still be incessant<lb/>and that was something of a proportion between the <del><gap/></del><lb/>members of the <add>standing</add> army &#x2014; actually trained and <unclear>embeded</unclear><lb/> and trained as well as armed, and the number of that<lb/>part of the people who were armed indeed but without being<lb/>either <unclear>embeded</unclear> or trained or <unclear>embeded</unclear> who though they had<lb/>arms in their hands were unpractised in the <add>military</add. use of them<lb/>to any military purpose.</p> <p>For this requisite the provision made <add>at the time</add> was the <add>state of</add> dependence<lb/> which <del>the mistakes<d/el> for its legal means of subordination<lb/> and its pay the military form was under such reference<lb/> to the pleasure <add>will</add> of the two Houses. <!-- bracket in pencil --> [<del>Then</del> <sic>Consider'd</sic> as<lb/>security against the power of the Crown, this dependence was<lb/>however in a much greater degree <gap/> than real.  For<lb/>in these days more especially a large military force was <add>manifestly</add> necessary<lb/>for the defence of the country against the <gap/> Monarch<lb/><del>supported by <gap/> <gap/></del> with an implacable enemy<lb/><add>of this country</add> the King of France for his support.  This security it was<lb/>therefore necessary to give up in practice, under pain of exposing<lb/> the country not only to greater danger, but to <gap/><lb/>and certain and immediate destruction.</p>     





Revision as of 10:37, 27 January 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Apr. 9

Radicalism not dangerous
(2) 2 Bill of Rights abrogated

In the next place, in full liberty mutual and universal for the communication
of facts and sentiments. On the point of the l To each House
of Parliament, liberty of express unrestricted liberty of discourse
communicating whatsoever they thought fit to the body of the
people. To the body of the people like liberty of communicating
whatsoever they thought fit to one another.

AOne condition requisite was still wanting as all these liberties
though enjoyed in their utmost extent would still be incessant
and that was something of a proportion between the
members of the standing army — actually trained and embeded
and trained as well as armed, and the number of that
part of the people who were armed indeed but without being
either embeded or trained or embeded who though they had
arms in their hands were unpractised in the military</add. use of them
to any military purpose.

For this requisite the provision made <add>at the time was the state of dependence
which the mistakes<d/el> for its legal means of subordination
and its pay the military form was under such reference
to the pleasure will of the two Houses. [Then
Consider'd as
security against the power of the Crown, this dependence was
however in a much greater degree than real. For
in these days more especially a large military force was manifestly necessary
for the defence of the country against the Monarch
supported by with an implacable enemy
of this country the King of France for his support. This security it was
therefore necessary to give up in practice, under pain of exposing
the country not only to greater danger, but to
and certain and immediate destruction.




Identifier: | JB/137/229/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-04-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

229

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46946

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in