JB/137/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/111/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
<del><gap/> <gap/></del></note>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del></note>
<p>&sect;.3.III. Partition of moveables impossible.</p>
<p>&sect;.3.III. Partition of moveables impossible.</p>
<del><gap/> and <gap/></del><add>To fact us pass an now</add> to property in a moveable shape, <add>Here</add><del><gap/></del><lb/>
<p><del><gap/> and <gap/></del><add>To fact us pass an now</add> to property in a moveable shape, <add>Here</add><del><gap/></del><lb/>
if measurement <add>weighing </add> enumeration and valuation be performed at all,<lb/>
if measurement <add>weighing </add> enumeration and valuation be performed at all,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> no time <del><gap/></del><add>would be to</add> to test: for, in a scale <del>varying <gap/> hundred</del> <add><del><gap/>ing <gap/></del></add> of <note><add>[+]</add> the <gap/> the respect<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> no time <del><gap/></del><add>would be to</add> to test: for, in a scale <del>varying <gap/> hundred</del> <add><del><gap/>ing <gap/></del></add> of <note><add>[+]</add> the <gap/> the respect<lb/>
Line 30: Line 30:
what are necessary to<lb/>
what are necessary to<lb/>
subsistence</note><lb/>
subsistence</note><lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>with hundreds of years  at one end and moments at the other,</add> decay will <del>be</del><add>rise with</add> more or less impudity: and<lb/>
as for reproduction, <add>of</add> <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, it will presently be seen this could be<lb/>
<gap/>.</p>
<p>An objective must have at the outset be anticipated,<lb/>
In the case of <hi rend="underline">moveable</hi> articles (it may be said) speak not<lb/>
of distinction <add>of value</add> as the necessary consequence of <hi rend="underline">division</hi> : of the<lb/>
destruction of <add>the</add> <hi rend="superscript">value</hi> as the necessary consequence of the<lb/>
division of the <hi rend="underline">substances</hi>: for by <hi rend="underline">sale</hi> , <add>then as now, </add> that <del>would be</del><lb/>
equalizations would be <add>made easy</add> <del>accomplished</del> which otherwise would<lb/>
be impossible in <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/> sale</del> <hi rend="underline">Sale</hi>, <add>with or without exception in regard to</add> necessaries from<lb/>
hand to mouth would, <add>were by the supposition</add> be altogether at one end. in the<lb/>
first place there would be no money at all <add>for purchase </add> in the next plan,<lb/>
if there were money any where, there would be none that<lb/>
would be spared for the purchase of <add>any of those</add> articles by the possession<lb/>
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed<lb/>
<del><gap/> of <gap/> <gap/></del>ly.  That there would be among the results<lb/>
<gap/> already have been anticipated.  But <del><gap/></del><add>a</add> proof <add>more</add> in detail<lb/>
will be seen presently.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 22:08, 30 January 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819. Nov.21

Nature of the case

IX. Radicalism not

S Employ
1 §.3.III. Moveables
Value must be
or of the articles

§.3.III. Partition of moveables impossible.

and To fact us pass an now to property in a moveable shape, Here
if measurement weighing enumeration and valuation be performed at all,
no time would be to to test: for, in a scale varying hundred ing of [+] the the respect
of which for
is this that
contribute acting to subsistence
and
comparatively the
the use to nothing..
the article
which will mount
be falling into decay
will be utterly distinctive
of all value, are these
what are necessary to
subsistence

with hundreds of years at one end and moments at the other, decay will berise with more or less impudity: and
as for reproduction, of that, it will presently be seen this could be
.

An objective must have at the outset be anticipated,
In the case of moveable articles (it may be said) speak not
of distinction of value as the necessary consequence of division : of the
destruction of the value as the necessary consequence of the
division of the substances: for by sale , then as now, that would be
equalizations would be made easy accomplished which otherwise would
be impossible in [+] sale Sale, with or without exception in regard to necessaries from
hand to mouth would, were by the supposition be altogether at one end. in the
first place there would be no money at all for purchase in the next plan,
if there were money any where, there would be none that
would be spared for the purchase of any of those articles by the possession
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed
of ly. That there would be among the results
already have been anticipated. But a proof more in detail
will be seen presently.






Identifier: | JB/137/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[unnumbered], 25]]

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

46828

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in