JB/004/085/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/085/001: Difference between revisions

Aj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:29, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

J B 1830 Augt 5 Review

1.

Inadequate arrangement
for deciding suits by
arbitration

2

Mutual consent necessary.

3.

But where one suitor
mala fide hi consent
to arbitration not obtainable.

4.

Such arbitration a trap
invented in William
thirds' days.

5

Portion of Jurisdiction
filched from Chancery
Judge by the wons
in equity § 79.

6.

Delays upon delays
fees upon fees costs
upon costs spun out
in tho Reconcilement
court

7

The examination copies
if laid on the Court of Chamerm
Table would produce
nothing but laughter.

8

That is all suitors in
tho Reconcilement
Courts would get.

9

True that if a pain of
fleasbe caught in this
web spider enough
would be at work upon them.




Identifier: | JB/004/085/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-08-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-22

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

george bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

2006

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in