JB/008/063/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/008/063/002: Difference between revisions

Alaina (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 119: Line 119:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:32, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1821. Aug. 4.

Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria Titles of Letters.

Part 1: Injury to Peninsular Span from her claim to dominion over Ultramarian Spain

Introduction.
Titles of the Sections.

SS1.
Indulgence enticated.

SS2.
Order pursued.

SS3.
Witness to Spanish meter's
opinions against the claim, Ao. 1787.
Joseph Townsend.

SS4.
Spanish Ruler's opinions
against the claim Ao. 1787.

SS5.
Townsend's opinion. Ao. 1787.

SS6.
Tables, showing the grounds]
of these opinions with preliminary
explanations.

SS7.
Jeremy Bentham's opinion,
against the claim, Ao. 1792, as applied to
France, and to distant
dependencies in general.

Part I Letter 1.
Plan of the work.

Part I Letter 2.
Interests concerned —
preliminary distinctions.

Part I Letter 3.
To the subject many in
Spain, the dominion w<hi rend="underline">d
be hurtful, were Ultramarians
ever so desirous
of submitting to it: viz.
1 in a pecuniary view.
Ultramaria submissive,
profit none; less, great

Part I Letter 4.
13y Ultramarian submission,
how extensive
soever, no continued receipt
of money in Spain
would be rendered probable.
The Code, if submitted
so, affords no such
probability.
Under Code, profit none.

Part I Letter 5.
Much more in proportion
as they are averse, as under
the Constitution they
can not fail to be. Causes
of such aversion enumerated —
explanation and
proof postponed.
Ultramarian submission
why impossible.

Part I Letter 6.
To the ruling few indeed
the claim would, in a
great degree, be profitable.
Hence, one cause of the attachment
to it.
From claim, Ruler's profit
great.

Part I. Letter 7.
II To the subject many in
Spain, in a Constitutional
view, the claim can not
but be productive of great
evils.

I. Anti-Constitutional.
Evil 1. Vitiating the composition
of the Cortes.
1. In Cortes, foreign interest
predominantly not obstruction.

Part I Letter 8.
2. Anti Constitutional
Evil Adding to the
mass of corruptive influence.

2. Corruptive influence
encreased.




Identifier: | JB/008/063/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8.

Date_1

1821-08-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

008

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

063a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Info in main headings field

rid yourselves of ultramaria titles of letters

Image

002

Titles

part i injury to peninsular spain from her claim to dominion over ultramarian spain

Category

plan

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

3167

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in