JB/071/022/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/022/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/022/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/022/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<head>23.</head>
<head>C</head><!-- centred -->
<!-- first horizontal line of header -->
<head>Simple <add>Corporal Injuries</add> <del>Of <gap/><!-- ...ses ('Causes' I think (as in the previous few) but actually I can only make out the 'ses' at the end) --> Extenuations</del>.</head>
<!-- second horizontal line of header -->
<p>employed; nor shall it be considered whether a person revolving
<lb/>
the circumstances at his leisure could or could not have
<lb/>
thought of a cheaper means of repelling the attack but whether
<lb/>
any such cheaper means did actually occur to the party at
<lb/>
the itme.
<lb/></p>
 
<head>Exposition.</head><!-- centre -->
<p>[(A)<!-- (A) in pencil --> Les mischief]  As if a man were suddenly to assault
<lb/>
You with a stick at a time that a stout stick and an iron
<lb/>
bar of the same size were both lying within your reach :
<lb/>
where upon snatching up the iron bar you strike him in
<lb/>
such a manner as to give him dangerous bruise or kill
<lb/>
him . In such case unless it sppears that you deliberately took
<lb/>
up the iron bar in preference to the stick intending therewith
<lb/>
to kill him or hurt him more than was necessary , it
<lb/>
shall still be accounted justifiable self-defence
<lb/></p>
<p>[(B)<!-- (B) in pencil --> Uncertain efficacy]  As if in the case just mentioned it happened
<lb/>
that you were much weaker than the assailant ; insomuch
<lb/>
that it would have been doubtful whether with the less
<lb/>
powerful weapon of the two, you could have effectually defended
<lb/>
Yourself.
<lb/></p>





Revision as of 11:50, 8 June 2011

Click Here To Edit


23. C Simple Corporal Injuries Of Extenuations.

employed; nor shall it be considered whether a person revolving
the circumstances at his leisure could or could not have
thought of a cheaper means of repelling the attack but whether
any such cheaper means did actually occur to the party at
the itme.

Exposition.

[(A) Les mischief] As if a man were suddenly to assault
You with a stick at a time that a stout stick and an iron
bar of the same size were both lying within your reach :
where upon snatching up the iron bar you strike him in
such a manner as to give him dangerous bruise or kill
him . In such case unless it sppears that you deliberately took
up the iron bar in preference to the stick intending therewith
to kill him or hurt him more than was necessary , it
shall still be accounted justifiable self-defence

[(B) Uncertain efficacy] As if in the case just mentioned it happened
that you were much weaker than the assailant ; insomuch
that it would have been doubtful whether with the less
powerful weapon of the two, you could have effectually defended
Yourself.




Identifier: | JB/071/022/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

022

Info in main headings field

simple corporal injuries

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f21 / f22 / f23 / f24

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23425

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in