★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
Will they be willing to profit by it? some may<lb/> others not: but of these is one whose partiality<lb/> is strong and decided, it is <del>to</del> from him that<lb/> the decision comes. The Jury <unclear>which</unclear> partialities<lb/> which previous application may have<lb/> produced in the Judge? — mistake upon mistake<lb/> — checking | Will they be willing to profit by it? some may<lb/> others not: but of these is one whose partiality<lb/> is strong and decided, it is <del>to</del> from him that<lb/> the decision comes. The Jury <unclear>which</unclear> partialities<lb/> which previous application may have<lb/> produced in the Judge? — mistake upon mistake<lb/> — checking is no <unclear>province</unclear> of the Jury<lb/> What have the Jury to do with checking? They<lb/> are not <gap/> ; they are agents and sole<lb/> agents. Would not any <add>a stranger</add> <del>he</del> suppose from this<lb/> <gap/> that it was the Judge who gave<lb/> the verdict, and <add>that the province of <del>the</del></add> the Jury was to put a negative<lb/> upon it or alter it if they pleased?<lb/> The case <add>truth</add> is that the Judge by the influence<lb/> of his opinion in the Court which has the power<lb/> of granting a new trial <del>may</del> may in some<lb/> cases do something towards checking the power of<lb/> the Jury. — The Jury check <sic>partialities</sic> in the<lb/> Judge? The fact is that <unclear>whatsoever</unclear> is <add>ever</add> done in the<lb/> way of <!-- deletion between lines --> checking partialities is done by the <gap/> which in the course of his charge may<lb/> be given, | ||
Will they be willing to profit by it? some may
others not: but of these is one whose partiality
is strong and decided, it is to from him that
the decision comes. The Jury which partialities
which previous application may have
produced in the Judge? — mistake upon mistake
— checking is no province of the Jury
What have the Jury to do with checking? They
are not ; they are agents and sole
agents. Would not any a stranger he suppose from this
that it was the Judge who gave
the verdict, and that the province of the the Jury was to put a negative
upon it or alter it if they pleased?
The case truth is that the Judge by the influence
of his opinion in the Court which has the power
of granting a new trial may may in some
cases do something towards checking the power of
the Jury. — The Jury check partialities in the
Judge? The fact is that whatsoever is ever done in the
way of checking partialities is done by the which in the course of his charge may
be given,
|
Identifier: | JB/035/064/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
064 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f5 / f6 / f7 / f8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
10657 |
|||
