JB/096/099/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/099/004: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/096/099/004" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 27: Line 27:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


INTROD. A LAW — 8 cases in respect of it's expediency [BR][2][ ]

It may here indeed be observed that the Money
which he is amerced goes to the State and therefore is not
lost: The Absurdity of such a proposition provision
will therefore appear still stronger & more unquestionable
if instead of the Fine we take for the Punishment any
Number of Stripes, no Matter what, which any one
may suppose equivalent to it. — I made choice in
the Example of a suffering having the same Subject
as the Crime only for the Simplicity of the Picture




Identifier: | JB/096/099/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

099

Info in main headings field

ch…of laws in general - measure of their expediency

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f6 / f7 / f8 /

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31103

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in