JB/035/065/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/065/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>of every kind <add>we have already seen</add> is a property naturally to be expected<lb/> from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been<lb/> improved in a variety of ways <add>more ways than one</add>: by <gap/> <add>unity</add><lb/> by extraordinary dignity, <del>and</del> by exclusion from all<lb/> other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each<lb/> Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere<lb/> may be expected to have <add><unclear>inborn</unclear></add> a larger map of<lb/> connection than a Judge. But to one Judge<lb/> there are twelve Jurymen.  There is therefore<lb/> more than twelve times the danger of a want of<lb/> <del>and</del> indifference on the part of the Jury than<lb/><add>This already <unclear>assumes</unclear><lb/> probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve.</add> on the part of the Judge.<note>And Jurymen <del>are</del> naturally are and indeed ought to be collected <gap/> from all the <add>many</add> different parts of the <del>country</del> county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some <unclear>spice</unclear> of it is likely to be found in every Jury  </note> What is more, the<lb/> more violent the partiality the more likely it<lb/> is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,<lb/> and in an English Jury the most obstinate<lb/> is master of the prize. The mischief <add>danger</add> it is<lb/> <unclear>done</unclear> <del>would be</del> owes much of its <unclear>iniquitude</unclear>, as<lb/> we <gap/> to the <unclear>bane</unclear> of unanimity. But it is<lb/> under this law with this law belonging to it<lb/> on <add>to</add> the system as it stands, with this law forming<lb/> part of it that the <del>advantage in point of deff</del> <add><del>encomium</del><add>praise of <gap/></add></add><lb/> and <gap/> is thus bestowed. </p>  
<p>of every kind <add>we have already seen</add> is a property naturally to be expected<lb/> from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been<lb/> improved in a variety of ways <add>more ways than one</add>: by <gap/> <add>unity</add><lb/> by extraordinary dignity, <del>and</del> by exclusion from all<lb/> other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each<lb/> Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere<lb/> may be expected to have <add><unclear>inborn</unclear></add> a larger map of<lb/> connection than a Judge. But to one Judge<lb/> there are twelve Jurymen.  There is therefore<lb/> more than twelve times the danger of a want of<lb/> <del>and</del> indifference on the part of the Jury than<lb/><add>This already assumes<lb/> probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve.</add> on the part of the Judge.<note>And Jurymen <del>are</del> naturally are and indeed ought to be collected <gap/> from all the <add>many</add> different parts of the <del>country</del> county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some <unclear>spice</unclear> of it is likely to be found in every Jury  </note> What is more, the<lb/> more violent the partiality the more likely it<lb/> is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,<lb/> and in an English Jury the most obstinate<lb/> is master of the prize. The mischief <add>danger</add> it is<lb/> <unclear>done</unclear> <del>would be</del> owes much of its <unclear>iniquitude</unclear>, as<lb/> we <gap/> to the <unclear>bane</unclear> of unanimity. But it is<lb/> under this law with this law belonging to it<lb/> on <add>to</add> the system as it stands, with this law forming<lb/> part of it that the <del>advantage in point of deff</del> <add><del>encomium</del><add>praise of <gap/></add></add><lb/> and <gap/> is thus bestowed. </p>  





Revision as of 11:48, 8 July 2011

Click Here To Edit

of every kind we have already seen is a property naturally to be expected
from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been
improved in a variety of ways more ways than one: by unity
by extraordinary dignity, and by exclusion from all
other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each
Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere
may be expected to have inborn a larger map of
connection than a Judge. But to one Judge
there are twelve Jurymen. There is therefore
more than twelve times the danger of a want of
and indifference on the part of the Jury than
This already assumes
probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve.
on the part of the Judge.And Jurymen are naturally are and indeed ought to be collected from all the many different parts of the country county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some spice of it is likely to be found in every Jury What is more, the
more violent the partiality the more likely it
is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,
and in an English Jury the most obstinate
is master of the prize. The mischief danger it is
done would be owes much of its iniquitude, as
we to the bane of unanimity. But it is
under this law with this law belonging to it
on to the system as it stands, with this law forming
part of it that the advantage in point of deff encomium<add>praise of </add>
and is thus bestowed.




Identifier: | JB/035/065/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

065

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

floyd & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10658

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in