★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<hi rend='underline'><unclear>Dissent</unclear> inseparable from the institution.</hi></p> | <hi rend='underline'><unclear>Dissent</unclear> inseparable from the institution.</hi></p> | ||
<p><!-- indent --> | <p><!-- indent --> | ||
<del>I now</del> Having cleared the <del>inquiry</del> <add><del>subject<add>question</add | <del>I now</del> Having cleared the <del>inquiry</del> <add><del>subject<add>question</add> of all<lb/> considerations that do not belong to it, I come now<lb/> to speak of the defects which can not but be placed<lb/> to the account of <add>this species of tribunal</add> <del>the institution,</del> being<lb/> interwoven with its very essence. These defects<lb/> may be <add>summed up in one:</add> <del>reduced to a <gap/> of one</del> :viz: the<lb/> not being answerable to its end in any one point<lb/> of view whatever. Take it, <add>indeed,</add> as it stands in practice,<lb/> complicated with a <add>variety of accidental concomitants </add> <del><gap/> appendages that do<lb/> not belong to it,</del> it has, <add>as we have seen</add> its good points as well<lb/> as its bad ones. But <del>all its</del> <add>for <del>what</del> <add>the</add> sprinkling it has of</add> good properties <del>depen<lb/> it is indebted for to circumstances </del> <add>to what is it indebted? Solely to those very appendages</add> that <add>wh</add> do not belong<lb/> to it <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> or a set of rules of procedure that might be given to any <add>sort of</add> tribunal, and ought to be given to every one</note> <del><unclear>strip it naked</unclear> and which <add>that</add> might<lb/> be safer <gap/> with equal if not superior advantage<lb/> upon a <add>system altogether different</add> quite different system.</del> <note><del>and in particular to my system of single elective Judges with <gap/> advantage</del></note> Take it as<lb/> <del>in</del> it is in itself it has no one single title<lb/> to preference: perhaps not even in comparison with the <add>systems</add> <del>establishments</del> generally in use: at any rate<lb/> not in comparison of tribunals comprised of single<lb/> <add>elective</add> Judges dependent on the people. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Dissent inseparable from the institution.
I now Having cleared the inquiry subject<add>question of all
considerations that do not belong to it, I come now
to speak of the defects which can not but be placed
to the account of this species of tribunal the institution, being
interwoven with its very essence. These defects
may be summed up in one: reduced to a of one :viz: the
not being answerable to its end in any one point
of view whatever. Take it, indeed, as it stands in practice,
complicated with a variety of accidental concomitants appendages that do
not belong to it, it has, as we have seen its good points as well
as its bad ones. But all its for what <add>the sprinkling it has of</add> good properties depen
it is indebted for to circumstances to what is it indebted? Solely to those very appendages that wh do not belong
to it ++ or a set of rules of procedure that might be given to any sort of tribunal, and ought to be given to every one strip it naked and which that might
be safer with equal if not superior advantage
upon a system altogether different quite different system. and in particular to my system of single elective Judges with advantage Take it as
in it is in itself it has no one single title
to preference: perhaps not even in comparison with the systems establishments generally in use: at any rate
not in comparison of tribunals comprised of single
elective Judges dependent on the people.
|
Identifier: | JB/035/028/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-4 |
|||
|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
|
028 |
|||
|
001 |
defects inseparable from the constitution |
||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
10621 |
|||
