JB/035/031/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/031/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>+</head><lb/>
<head>+</head><lb/>
<p>is composed of the whole nation, with whatever is<lb/> most conspicuous for probity or intelligence at<lb/> the head of it. The Juryman's work is composed<lb/> of his <add>neighbors and</add> pot-companions, and a few of his principal<lb/> customers and employers. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>Oftentimes some <add>Individual</add> <del>principal</del> personage on whom he is in a state of entire dependence, some landlord, some creditor, a sole employer fills up <del>the</del> and constitutes the whole. What if this personage or some <add>close</add> <del>intimate</del> connection of his should be a party to the <del><gap/></del> suit?</note> The same cause <add>therefore,</add> which<lb/> serves to guard the probity of the Judge against<lb/> the seduction of private influence, <del>impos</del> lays<lb/> that of the Juryman at the mercy of private influence.<lb/> What has the Juryman to hope for or<lb/> to fear from the great public? It can neither<lb/> afford him protection <del>nor</del> against the <add>all <gap/></add> <del>unjust</del><lb/> <del>censure</del> of <del>others</del> individuals nor make him <add>a</add> sufferer<lb/> by its own. If <add>the justices of the public</add> <del>those</del> whose probity depends upon<lb/> their subjection to public opinion are <add>placed</add> out of<lb/> the reach of <add>that <unclear>tutelary</unclear> power</add> <del>public opinion</del> what matters it <add>how</add> <del>long<lb/> what excuses?</del> What matters is whether <del>it is because<lb/></del> they <add>are</add> stand above it or <del><gap/></del> below it?   
<p>is composed of the whole nation, with whatever is<lb/> most conspicuous for probity or intelligence at<lb/> the head of it. The Juryman's work is composed<lb/> of his <add>neighbors and</add> pot-companions, and a few of his principal<lb/> customers and employers. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>Oftentimes some <add>Individual</add> <del>principal</del> personage on whom he is in a state of entire dependence, some landlord, some creditor, a sole employer fills up <del>the</del> and constitutes the whole. What if this personage or some <add>close</add> <del>intimate</del> connection of his should be a party to the <del><gap/></del> suit?</note> The same cause <add>therefore,</add> which<lb/> serves to guard the probity of the Judge against<lb/> the seduction of private influence, <del>impos</del> lays<lb/> that of the Juryman at the mercy of private influence.<lb/> What has the Juryman to hope for or<lb/> to fear from the great public? It can neither<lb/> afford him protection <del>nor</del> against the <add>ill will</add> <del>unjust</del><lb/> <del>censure</del> of <del>others</del> individuals nor make him <add>a</add> sufferer<lb/> by its own. If <add>the justices of the public</add> <del>those</del> whose probity depends upon<lb/> their subjection to public opinion are <add>placed</add> out of<lb/> the reach of <add>that <unclear>tutelary</unclear> power</add> <del>public opinion</del> what matters it <add>how</add> <del>long<lb/> what excuses?</del> What matters is whether <del>it is because<lb/></del> they <add>are</add> stand above it or <del><gap/></del> below it?   
</p>
</p>



Revision as of 19:32, 18 July 2011

Click Here To Edit

+

is composed of the whole nation, with whatever is
most conspicuous for probity or intelligence at
the head of it. The Juryman's work is composed
of his neighbors and pot-companions, and a few of his principal
customers and employers. + +Oftentimes some Individual principal personage on whom he is in a state of entire dependence, some landlord, some creditor, a sole employer fills up the and constitutes the whole. What if this personage or some close intimate connection of his should be a party to the suit? The same cause therefore, which
serves to guard the probity of the Judge against
the seduction of private influence, impos lays
that of the Juryman at the mercy of private influence.
What has the Juryman to hope for or
to fear from the great public? It can neither
afford him protection nor against the ill will unjust
censure of others individuals nor make him a sufferer
by its own. If the justices of the public those whose probity depends upon
their subjection to public opinion are placed out of
the reach of that tutelary power public opinion what matters it how long
what excuses?
What matters is whether it is because
they are stand above it or below it?



Identifier: | JB/035/031/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

031

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10624

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in