JB/051/004/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/004/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
how far it may be a prudent precaution , to set
how far it may be a prudent precaution , to set
<lb/>
<lb/>
up marks <add><gap/> limits</add> , the <gap/> <sic>serpassing</sic> of which may be obnoxious
up <add><gap/></add> marks <add>limits</add> <note>to <del>set the fate of the accused upon <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/><!-- last word is 1 word I think ? --></del></note> , the <gap/> <sic>serpassing</sic> of which may be obnoxious
<lb/>
<lb/>
to detection , &amp; <add><sic>to</sic><unclear> hard</unclear><!-- or, sad --> <unclear>whenever</unclear></add> to rest the fate of the accused <del>upon</del>
to detection , &amp; <add><sic>to</sic><unclear> hard</unclear><!-- or, sad --> <unclear>whenever</unclear></add> to rest the fate of the accused <del>upon</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
some circumstances at least <del>not</del> <add>out of</add> their <sic>controul</sic>;  
some circumstances at least <del>not</del> <add>out of</add> their <sic>controul</sic>;  
 
<lb/>
 
but to Judges <del>this</del> <add><gap/></add> <unclear>answers</unclear> by &amp; successfully stripped
<lb/>
of every wish or motive but to do right , as are our
<lb/>
Juries , this question I should think might <add>in criminal matters</add> stand in
<lb/>
the placed of all rules of Evidence that have been
<lb/>
devised <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add>Are you, from what you <add><unclear>may</unclear></add> have <add>now</add> heard in Court enough satisfied of the truth of the charge against this man , to find him guilty ?</note>  <note>To <gap/> are evil which is <del>certain</del> possible but not probable , they establish one that is certain. </note>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 13:19, 19 July 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...


CERTAINTY EVIDENCE - Standing rules reprobated.

Against Judges exposed to exterior influence , ruminated
to & removable from a lucrative office
at the pleasure of men in power , without the check
of the judgment of a public audience, I enquire know not
how far it may be a prudent precaution , to set
up marks limits to set the fate of the accused upon of , the serpassing of which may be obnoxious
to detection , & to hard whenever to rest the fate of the accused upon
some circumstances at least not out of their controul;
but to Judges this answers by & successfully stripped
of every wish or motive but to do right , as are our
Juries , this question I should think might in criminal matters stand in
the placed of all rules of Evidence that have been
devised [+] [+]Are you, from what you may have now heard in Court enough satisfied of the truth of the charge against this man , to find him guilty ? To are evil which is certain possible but not probable , they establish one that is certain.




Identifier: | JB/051/004/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

certainty evidence - standing rules reprobated

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16169

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in