JB/035/033/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/033/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/033/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/033/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- light "X" on page -->
<p><!-- indent -->    Probity in a Judge is no <add>otherwise</add> farther of use than in<lb/> as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude<lb/> of decision: <sic>inprobity</sic>, <del>no otherwise than</del> of <gap/><lb/> no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary<lb/> effect. The duty of a Judge <add>judging</add> on the question of<lb/> fact is to decide according to the evidence. <add>Being</add> <del>Not</del><lb/> a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing<lb/> to do with the propriety of the law. If there be<lb/> any instances in which a Judge is habitually<lb/> <note>by the influence of any principle</note> in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence<lb/> that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the<lb/> exercise of his function: whether the principle that<lb/> <add>governs him</add> determines his conduct be termed <sic>improbity</sic> or<lb/> corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious<lb/> name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity<lb/> love of liberty, <gap/>, call it by any other still<lb/> more reputable name if you can find one, the<lb/> effect in this point of view is just the same. 
</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 22:05, 19 July 2011

Click Here To Edit

Probity in a Judge is no otherwise farther of use than in
as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude
of decision: inprobity, no otherwise than of
no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary
effect. The duty of a Judge judging on the question of
fact is to decide according to the evidence. Being Not
a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing
to do with the propriety of the law. If there be
any instances in which a Judge is habitually
by the influence of any principle in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence
that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the
exercise of his function: whether the principle that
governs him determines his conduct be termed improbity or
corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious
name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity
love of liberty, , call it by any other still
more reputable name if you can find one, the
effect in this point of view is just the same.


















Identifier: | JB/035/033/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

14-16

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

033

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

l munn

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10626

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in