★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- light "X" on page --> | <!-- light "X" on page --> | ||
<p><!-- indent --> Probity in a Judge is no <add>otherwise</add> farther of use than in<lb/> as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude<lb/> of decision: <sic>inprobity</sic>, <del>no otherwise than</del> of <gap/><lb/> no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary<lb/> effect. The duty of a Judge <add>judging</add> on the question of<lb/> fact is to decide according to the evidence. <add>Being</add> <del>Not</del><lb/> a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing<lb/> to do with the propriety of the law. If there be<lb/> any instances in which a Judge is habitually<lb/> <note>by the influence of any principle</note> in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence<lb/> that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the<lb/> exercise of his function: whether the principle that<lb/> <add>governs him</add> determines his conduct be termed <sic>improbity</sic> or<lb/> corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious<lb/> name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity<lb/> love of liberty, | <p><!-- indent --> Probity in a Judge is no <add>otherwise</add> farther of use than in<lb/> as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude<lb/> of decision: <sic>inprobity</sic>, <del>no otherwise than</del> of <gap/><lb/> no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary<lb/> effect. The duty of a Judge <add>judging</add> on the question of<lb/> fact is to decide according to the evidence. <add>Being</add> <del>Not</del><lb/> a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing<lb/> to do with the propriety of the law. If there be<lb/> any instances in which a Judge is habitually<lb/> <note>by the influence of any principle</note> in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence<lb/> that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the<lb/> exercise of his function: whether the principle that<lb/> <add>governs him</add> determines his conduct be termed <sic>improbity</sic> or<lb/> corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious<lb/> name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity<lb/> love of liberty, piety, call it by any other still<lb/> more reputable name if you can find one, the<lb/> effect in this point of view is just the same. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Probity in a Judge is no otherwise farther of use than in
as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude
of decision: inprobity, no otherwise than of
no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary
effect. The duty of a Judge judging on the question of
fact is to decide according to the evidence. Being Not
a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing
to do with the propriety of the law. If there be
any instances in which a Judge is habitually
by the influence of any principle in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence
that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the
exercise of his function: whether the principle that
governs him determines his conduct be termed improbity or
corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious
name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity
love of liberty, piety, call it by any other still
more reputable name if you can find one, the
effect in this point of view is just the same.
Identifier: | JB/035/033/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
14-16 |
|||
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
033 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f15 / f16 |
||
jeremy bentham |
l munn |
||
benjamin constant |
|||
10626 |
|||