JB/072/120/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/120/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/120/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/120/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head><hi rend='superscript'>14)</hi> Offences respecting the <hi rend='underline'>persons</hi> of <hi rend='underline'>Individuals.</hi><!-- this word underlined twice --></head>
<p>patient , being the person where feelings are concerned,
<lb/>
is after hearing the report made by the Medical
<lb/>
practitioner , <add>in general</add> the fittest judges
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent --><note>Exemption &#x2014; Consent [of the Sufferer.]</note>  Another ground of exemption is the consent of
<lb/>
the sufferer on whatever account given .
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent -->If a man consents to have an act performed upon
<lb/>
him , it is <add>a</add> plain sign that the sensation thereby produced <del>although</del> <add>whatever</add> it might appear to a bystander is
<lb/>
either not painful or if painful is attended by
<lb/>
a pleasure <add>or appears likely to be attended with a negative good</add> more than equivalent .  Otherwise what
<lb/>
should <add>him</add> induced him to consent ?
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent by 1-2 spaces -->For this however to be the case , the consent <del><unclear>ought</unclear></del>
<lb/>
must have been <hi rend='underline'>free</hi> [; nor <del><gap/></del> must there have been
<lb/>
on the part of the author of the act any <del><gap/></del> <add>industrious</add>
<lb/>
<add><hi rend='underline'>purposed</hi></add> concealment of consequences known by him to be
<lb/>
probable.] and <hi rend='underline'>fairly</hi> obtained.
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:05, 27 July 2011

Click Here To Edit


14) Offences respecting the persons of Individuals.

patient , being the person where feelings are concerned,
is after hearing the report made by the Medical
practitioner , in general the fittest judges

Exemption — Consent [of the Sufferer.] Another ground of exemption is the consent of
the sufferer on whatever account given .

If a man consents to have an act performed upon
him , it is a plain sign that the sensation thereby produced although whatever it might appear to a bystander is
either not painful or if painful is attended by
a pleasure or appears likely to be attended with a negative good more than equivalent . Otherwise what
should him induced him to consent ?

For this however to be the case , the consent ought
must have been free [; nor must there have been
on the part of the author of the act any industrious
purposed concealment of consequences known by him to be
probable.] and fairly obtained.



Identifier: | JB/072/120/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

120

Info in main headings field

simple personal injuries / offences respecting the persons of individuals

Image

002

Titles

exemption / medical practice / exemption - / consent / circumstances of extenuation / grounds of extenuation

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e13 / e14 / e15 / e16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23737

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in