★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/093/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/079/093/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>4<lb/> | |||
Observations. Inferenda</head> | |||
<p>Later themselves to some other business: this other business<lb/> | |||
must support them for three years. If it<lb/> | |||
support them for 3 years willit be worth their<lb/> | |||
while to relinquish it, and to take themselves again<lb/> | |||
to that from which they were turned out with<lb/> | |||
ignominy?</p> | |||
But Recognizance is a Compact: an ent<lb/> | |||
by which the individual is indeed subjected to penalties <lb/> | |||
but subjected by his own consent. What the penalties are<lb/> | |||
therefore is no matter; hardship in then<lb/> | |||
there can be none: since the submitting to them is<lb/> | |||
his own choice. Is it possible there can be any<lb/> | |||
men with whom this Logic can prevail? Yes there<lb/> | |||
are. For ther eis no absurdity that men have not been<lb/> | |||
prevailed in themselves<lb/> | |||
made to swallow where mixed up with the words<lb/> | |||
"consent" and "compact". Words which seem fated to <lb/> | |||
confusion into every dispute into which they are admitted.<lb/> | |||
To those who are not governed by sound it is must be<lb/> | |||
manifest that there is just as much of consent in the one<lb/> | |||
case as in the other. A set of regulations are prescribed;<lb/> | |||
consents to submit to certain punishments, if these <lb/> | |||
regulations are not observed by him - why? because<lb/> | |||
if he does not consent he cannot get his license: and<lb/> | |||
if he does not get a license, he will be punished if he | |||
4
Observations. Inferenda
Later themselves to some other business: this other business
must support them for three years. If it
support them for 3 years willit be worth their
while to relinquish it, and to take themselves again
to that from which they were turned out with
ignominy?
But Recognizance is a Compact: an ent
by which the individual is indeed subjected to penalties
but subjected by his own consent. What the penalties are
therefore is no matter; hardship in then
there can be none: since the submitting to them is
his own choice. Is it possible there can be any
men with whom this Logic can prevail? Yes there
are. For ther eis no absurdity that men have not been
prevailed in themselves
made to swallow where mixed up with the words
"consent" and "compact". Words which seem fated to
confusion into every dispute into which they are admitted.
To those who are not governed by sound it is must be
manifest that there is just as much of consent in the one
case as in the other. A set of regulations are prescribed;
consents to submit to certain punishments, if these
regulations are not observed by him - why? because
if he does not consent he cannot get his license: and
if he does not get a license, he will be punished if he
|
Identifier: | JB/079/093/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
093 |
observations |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
b1 / e2 / b3 e3 / e4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]] |
||
|
25535 |
|||
