JB/159/034/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/034/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:45, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Punishment distinguished & defence?

act that has been done [or ? omitted to be done] or ? that has been

Note question might not be ranked? under all or most of these denominations. Thus stands the matter of the questions concerning the denomination to be given to the act with reference to the agent's design [intention] or if the question he reference to the tendency or in other words, to the probable effects of the act, considering if a priori, it will be found probably to come under all these several denominations: if with reference to the event; or in other words to the actual effects, that is a matter which could be known only by the individuals whose feelings are in question. Whether any Juryman was gratified by the thoughts of the pain? he expected




Identifier: | JB/159/034/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

21

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

punishment distinguished & defined

Image

002

Titles

note

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17 / f18 / f19 / f20

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53857

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in