★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
For the most powerful individual in the state<lb/> will be cautious of committing any flagrant invasion<lb/> of another's rights, when he knows that<lb/> the fact of his oppression must be examined and<lb/> decided by twelve indifferent men, not appointed<lb/> till the hour of trial; and that, when ever the<lb/> fact is ascertained, the law must of course redress it. No such thing — <add>the mere</add> lodging of the <del><gap/></del> <add>decision</add><lb/> <add>of the fact</add> in such hands is not worth a straw:<lb/> the application of the redress must be lodged in the<lb/> same hands for the purpose here in question or<lb/> the decision might as well be in any other and the<lb/> fact is that in certain cases this conjunction actually<lb/> has place. | For the most powerful individual in the state<lb/> will be cautious of committing any flagrant invasion<lb/> of another's rights, when he knows that<lb/> the fact of his oppression must be examined and<lb/> decided by twelve indifferent men, not appointed<lb/> till the hour of trial; and that, when ever the<lb/> fact is ascertained, the law must of course redress<lb/> it. No such thing — <add>the mere</add> lodging of the <del><gap/></del> <add>decision</add><lb/> <add>of the fact</add> in such hands is not worth a straw:<lb/> the application of the redress must be lodged in the<lb/> same hands for the purpose here in question or<lb/> the decision might as well be in any other and the<lb/> fact is that in certain cases this conjunction actually<lb/> has place. What would it have availed Mr Wilkes<lb/>that the question of fact <add>decision of the</add> whether he had been apprehended<lb/>by a warrant or no from the Earls of<lb/>Egremont and Halifax, Secretaries of State was<lb/>in the hands of a Jury, even throwing into the same<lb/>hands the question of law into the bargain: the<lb/>redress was also in their hands, and <del><gap/></del> the <add>plaintiff</add> in their<lb/> | ||
For the most powerful individual in the state
will be cautious of committing any flagrant invasion
of another's rights, when he knows that
the fact of his oppression must be examined and
decided by twelve indifferent men, not appointed
till the hour of trial; and that, when ever the
fact is ascertained, the law must of course redress
it. No such thing — the mere lodging of the decision
of the fact in such hands is not worth a straw:
the application of the redress must be lodged in the
same hands for the purpose here in question or
the decision might as well be in any other and the
fact is that in certain cases this conjunction actually
has place. What would it have availed Mr Wilkes
that the question of fact decision of the whether he had been apprehended
by a warrant or no from the Earls of
Egremont and Halifax, Secretaries of State was
in the hands of a Jury, even throwing into the same
hands the question of law into the bargain: the
redress was also in their hands, and the plaintiff in their
Identifier: | JB/035/071/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
071 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f5 / f6 / f7 / f8 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
arthur young |
|||
10664 |
|||