JB/035/047/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/047/002: Difference between revisions

Jillybean (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jillybean (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


The unanimity, though perhaps an invariable<lb/> and certainly a very close <del>concomitant</del> <add>accompaniment</add> to the instruction<lb/><del>that</del> unanimity, <del><add>the <gap/></add></del> <del>so much</del> <add>the feature so fondly</add> dwelt upon and<lb/><del><gap/></del> idolized is happily not altogether an essential<lb/>one.  When I say <hi rend='underline'>unanimity</hi> the <hi rend='underline'>unison of</hi><lb/><hi rend='underline'>minds</hi>, it is in compliance with the impropriety<lb/>of language: <unclear><hi rend='underline'>univocality</hi></unclear>, <!-- ?neologism --> the union of views, if<lb/>there were such an expression, would be the proper <del><gap/></del><p>paragraph</p><del><gap/>something may be said for the <gap/><lb/><gap/> means by which and by which only such<lb/>a sort of union could be insured.</del><lb/><gap/>. It is the sort of unanimity which tyrants<lb/> vouchsafe to be content with, and which none but<lb/>tyrants would they allow themselves to reflect,<lb/> would content themselves with: it is the unanimity<lb/> which in the Church is produced by forced creeds<lb/>and subscriptions, and tests and <del> penal laws</del> persecuting laws.<p>paragraph</p>I speak here only of Juries for trial: as for sort<lb/>of Juries used for previous inquiry, under the name<lb/>of Grand-Juries, they will be considered separately.<pb/>
The unanimity, though perhaps an invariable<lb/> and certainly a very close <del>concomitant</del> <add>accompaniment</add> to the instruction<lb/><del>that</del> unanimity, <del><add>the <gap/></add></del> <del>so much</del> <add>the feature so fondly</add> dwelt upon and<lb/><del><gap/></del> idolized is happily not altogether an essential<lb/>one.  When I say <hi rend='underline'>unanimity</hi> the <hi rend='underline'>unison of</hi><lb/><hi rend='underline'>minds</hi>, it is in compliance with the impropriety<lb/>of language: <unclear><hi rend='underline'>univocality</hi></unclear>, <!-- ?neologism --> the union of views, if<lb/>there were such an expression, would be the proper <del><gap/></del><p>paragraph</p><del><gap/>something may be said for the <gap/><lb/><gap/> means by which and by which only such<lb/>a sort of union could be insured.</del><lb/><gap/>. It is the sort of unanimity which tyrants<lb/> vouchsafe to be content with, and which none but<lb/>tyrants would they allow themselves to reflect,<lb/> would content themselves with: it is the unanimity<lb/> which in the Church is produced by forced creeds<lb/>and subscriptions, and tests and <del>penal laws</del>persecuting laws.<p>paragraph</p>I speak here only of Juries for trial: as for sort<lb/>of Juries used for previous inquiry, under the name<lb/>of Grand-Juries, they will be considered separately.<pb/>





Revision as of 17:03, 25 August 2011

Click Here To Edit

The unanimity, though perhaps an invariable
and certainly a very close concomitant accompaniment to the instruction
that unanimity, the so much the feature so fondly dwelt upon and
idolized is happily not altogether an essential
one. When I say unanimity the unison of
minds, it is in compliance with the impropriety
of language: univocality, the union of views, if
there were such an expression, would be the proper

paragraph

something may be said for the
means by which and by which only such
a sort of union could be insured.

. It is the sort of unanimity which tyrants
vouchsafe to be content with, and which none but
tyrants would they allow themselves to reflect,
would content themselves with: it is the unanimity
which in the Church is produced by forced creeds
and subscriptions, and tests and penal lawspersecuting laws.

paragraph

I speak here only of Juries for trial: as for sort
of Juries used for previous inquiry, under the name
of Grand-Juries, they will be considered separately.
---page break---




Identifier: | JB/035/047/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-7, 7a

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

047

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10640

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in