JB/002/393/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/393/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Importing all JB pages from Main Namespace on Testwiki
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:JB_002_393_001.jpg|520px|right]]
[[File:JB_002_393_001.jpg|520px|right]]
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Art. 1.  <note>Notes  <!-- white space --> 5</note><!-- 2 words (Notes  5) written in pencil --></head>
<head>Annuity Notes</head>
<p><note>Plan  1  Constitution</note>  6.  Yearly or half Yearly , there are many cases in which the probability
<lb/>
is , that it would not be applied for at the <hi rend='underline'>Government</hi> Offices : inasmuch
<lb/>
as it would be receivable with <del>a</del> less trouble , by the<hi rend='underline'> in</hi>dividual <hi rend='underline'>who</hi>
<lb/>
passes it , from the <hi rend='underline'>individual</hi> <hi rend='underline'>to whom</hi> he passes it , as is the practise in the
<lb/>
case of Exchequer Bills , Navy <del>Bills , and in other instances . &#x2014; <gap/></del> <add>and</add> India
<lb/>
Bonds.
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent -->On the other hand , were these Annuities ever to take the place of the
<lb/>
Stock Annuities , and so become the only redeemable Government Annuities ,
<lb/>
(an event which it will be seen is regarded as a probable one) the retardation
<lb/>
when thus become universal might perhaps be found productive of a
<lb/>
serious degree of inconvenience &#x2014; &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
<!-- two line depth of blank page -->
<p>The case sums to be , that if the interest were made <sic>recievable</sic>
<lb/>
half yearly , and the operation of <sic>recieving</sic> were
<lb/>
<sic>renderd</sic> as easy as it is capable of being rendered , the
<lb/>
disposition to forbear receiving the interest <del>wo</del> would
<lb/>
be very general , especially upon <del>the</del> small notes : and that
<lb/>
in that case , although it were made removable half
<lb/>
yearly it would neither be received half yearly , nor
<lb/>
so much as yearly : although if there were no possibility
<lb/>
of <sic>recieving</sic> it so frequently as half yearly , the <del>um</del>
<lb/>
unfrequency (compared with the <add>existing</add> practice in the case of
<lb/>
the exisitng Stock Annuities) <del>woul</del> might operate as
<lb/>
a considerable obstacle to the currency of the proposed
<lb/>
paper.  <del>The first thought that <gap/> is &#x2014;</del> that the <add>An idea that naturally presents itself in the first place , is &#x2014;</add>
<lb/>
way <del>to</del> <add>most effectual</add> if rendering it a common practice to forbear
<lb/>
receiving the interest , is to render the operation of <sic>recieving</sic>
<lb/>
it a<hi rend='underline'> troublesome</hi> one .  But , upon a second thought
<lb/>
it will appear , not only that , <add>this</add> is the way to hurt the
<lb/>
<del>credit</del> <add>currency</add> of the paper , but that a directly opposite course
<lb/>
has a much stronger tendency to be productive if the <add><del>same</del> effect</add>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 02:59, 29 August 2011

File:JB 002 393 001.jpg


Art. 1. Notes 5 Annuity Notes

Plan 1 Constitution 6. Yearly or half Yearly , there are many cases in which the probability
is , that it would not be applied for at the Government Offices : inasmuch
as it would be receivable with a less trouble , by the individual who
passes it , from the individual to whom he passes it , as is the practise in the
case of Exchequer Bills , Navy Bills , and in other instances . — and India
Bonds.

On the other hand , were these Annuities ever to take the place of the
Stock Annuities , and so become the only redeemable Government Annuities ,
(an event which it will be seen is regarded as a probable one) the retardation
when thus become universal might perhaps be found productive of a
serious degree of inconvenience — —


The case sums to be , that if the interest were made recievable
half yearly , and the operation of recieving were
renderd as easy as it is capable of being rendered , the
disposition to forbear receiving the interest wo would
be very general , especially upon the small notes : and that
in that case , although it were made removable half
yearly it would neither be received half yearly , nor
so much as yearly : although if there were no possibility
of recieving it so frequently as half yearly , the um
unfrequency (compared with the existing practice in the case of
the exisitng Stock Annuities) woul might operate as
a considerable obstacle to the currency of the proposed
paper. The first thought that is — that the An idea that naturally presents itself in the first place , is —
way to most effectual if rendering it a common practice to forbear
receiving the interest , is to render the operation of recieving
it a troublesome one . But , upon a second thought
it will appear , not only that , this is the way to hurt the
credit currency of the paper , but that a directly opposite course
has a much stronger tendency to be productive if the same effect


Template:Infobox Folio

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in