JB/137/254/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/254/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 22</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Radicalism not dangerous<lb/> (3) <note>&sect;. Rulers disregard<lb/> 1. Public 2. Appeal</note></p> <p>In the Statute Book are to be found a whole class of<lb/>Statutes termed <add>known</add> by the general appellation of Statutes for<lb/>the amendment of the law.  This Statutes term with <add><unclear>extensive</unclear></add> information<lb/>for those who are at once able and willing to make<lb/>use of it.  To <del>enumerate the</del> make out a distant best<lb/>of the several <gap/> abstracted as professed to be abolished<lb/> by them would be a useful work, but it is of the<lb/>number of them useful <gap/> which has not been <add>never yet</add> executed.<lb/> This argument <gap/> <gap/> fifty of them: add>of the</add> happen<lb/> but twenty <del>of them</del> <add>word <gap/> suppose</add> Not one of these twenty but<lb/>upon examination made use this view would of <del><gap/></del><lb/>itself suffice to demonstrate the impossibility that in the<lb/>breasts of these to <gap/> when the Grant of law enters Common<lb/> Law had its authors, any regard for the happiness <add><gap/></add> <lb/><add>interest</add> of the people, any regard for interests of justice, <del>and</del><lb/>any regard for interests other than there are personal<lb/>and <del><gap/></del> security interest lend pleas.  Well then with<lb/> all these foul spots in it was it the less <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add>?<lb/>entitled to the appellation of the perfection of reason?  Not it<lb/>indeed, if to know whether it be you apply to <add>any of</add> those whose<lb/>profit is derived from them, <add>that same spot</add> than <gap/> from Lord <del>Cok</del><lb/>Chief Justice Coke is if you choose to go so far <add>have patience</add> truth from<lb/><gap/> the 6th Lord Chancellor Fortescue, to the Lord<lb/>Chancellor that one is to be he who he may, through M<unclear>r</unclear><lb/>Justice <add>Sir William</add> Blackstone.  Like those in the chamber, the spots<lb/>in the opinion of the <sic>perfector</sic> of reason are now on the<lb/>change.  Yet so long as any particle of the rule of action<lb/>remains in this state, if it be a thousand years <gap/><lb/><gap/> of those who see their profit in them whether it be any<lb/> thing less than the perfection of reason, the answer will still be in the<lb/>negative.</p> <p><note>[+]<lb/>For these 14 years<lb/> past by the <gap/> which <lb/><gap/>this a catalogue<lb/>resembling this a precept<lb/>has been <gap/><lb/>to the public<lb/>eye.  In the <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> reform Act<lb/>eight and twenty distinct<lb/>sources of fallacies<lb/>delay, vexation and<lb/><sic>expence</sic> in judicature<lb/>has been enumerated<lb/> and <gap/> together in<lb/> form of a truth.  In<lb/>every one of them so<lb/><gap/> as suitors, could<lb/>these injured persons<lb/> who but for these impediments<lb/>would have been<lb/>suitors have been<lb/> sufferers by those <gap/><lb/> abomination, as<lb/>sure have these by whom<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> they <gap/> <gap/> and then by <gap/> thing have been <gap/> been <gap/> by them.  And of their number and preservation is not the <gap/. as plenty to be seen in the profit regard.<lb/><!-- 3 lines of text written above this and surrounded by dividing lines --> reaped by the creators and <gap/>, as that of the<lb/>source of the field in the crop, <gap/> for by the husbandman, at <add>in</add> whose <sic>expence</sic> <add><gap/></add> the saving was performed.</p> <!-- In the margin above the previous text --> <p>Now then of one indication given <add>above the <gap/> of action is the subject</add> of imperfection in this<lb/> or any other shape what is the <del>effect</del> <gap/> if it creates and<lb/>preserves is the effect?  In the first place, a <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/> <gap/><lb/>in the manner in which the <gap/> is given a pretence, <add><gap/> <gap/> and means</add> can<lb/> be found for <del.<gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add> <gap/> this by which it was given; if this <gap/></add><lb/>case not be done, then a determination to turn aside from the subject and that as<lb/>little of<lb/>it as<lb/>possible.</p>                             
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 22</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Radicalism not dangerous<lb/> (3) <note>&sect;. Rulers disregard<lb/> 1. Public 2. Appeal</note></p> <p>In the Statute Book are to be found a whole class of<lb/>Statutes termed <add>known</add> by the general appellation of Statutes for<lb/>the amendment of the law.  These Statutes <unclear>term</unclear> with <add><unclear>instruction</unclear></add> information<lb/>for those who are at once able and willing to make<lb/>use of it.  To <del>enumerate the</del> make out a distinct part<lb/>of the several <gap/> abolished or professed to be abolished<lb/> by them would be a useful work, but it is of the<lb/>number of them useful <gap/> which has not been <add>never yet</add> executed.<lb/> This argument <gap/> <gap/> fifty of them: <add>of the</add> happen<lb/> but twenty <del>of them</del> <add><gap/> <gap/> suppose</add> Not one of these twenty but<lb/>upon examination made use this view would of <del><gap/></del><lb/>itself suffice to demonstrate the impossibility that in the<lb/>breasts of these <del>to</del> viz when the branch of law called Common<lb/> Law had its authors, any regard for the happiness <add><gap/></add> <lb/><add>interest</add> of the people, any regard for interests of justice, <del>and</del><lb/>any regard for interests other than there are personal<lb/>and <del><gap/></del> security interest lend pleas.  Well then with<lb/> all these foul spots in it was it the less <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add>?<lb/>entitled to the appellation of the perfection of reason?  Not it<lb/>indeed, if to know whether it be you apply to <add>any of</add> those whose<lb/>profit is derived from them, <add>that same spot</add> <unclear>reckoning</unclear> from Lord <del>Cok</del><lb/>Chief Justice Coke is if you choose to go so far <add>have patience</add> truth from<lb/><gap/> the 6th Lord Chancellor Fortescue, to the Lord<lb/>Chancellor that now is to be he who he may, through M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>Justice <add>Sir William</add> Blackstone.  Like those in the chamber, the spots<lb/>in the opinion of the <sic>perfector</sic> of reason are ever on the<lb/>change.  Yet so long as any particle of the rule of action<lb/>remains in this state, if it be a thousand years <gap/><lb/>ask of those who see their profit in them whether it be any<lb/> thing less than the perfection of reason, the answer will still be in the<lb/>negative.</p> <!-- in the margin --><p>[+]<lb/>For these 14 years<lb/>past by the pen which <lb/>writes this a catalogue<lb/>resembling this a precept<lb/>has been presented<lb/>to the public<lb/>eye.  In the <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> Reform Act<lb/>eight and twenty distinct<lb/>sources of fallacies<lb/>delay, vexation and<lb/><sic>expence</sic> in judicature<lb/>have been enumerated<lb/> and <unclear>held</unclear> together in<lb/> form of a truth.  In<lb/>every one of them so<lb/><gap/> as suitors, could<lb/>these injured persons<lb/> who but for these impediments<lb/>would have been<lb/>suitors have been<lb/> sufferers by those <gap/><lb/> abomination, as<lb/>sure have these by whom<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> they <gap/> <gap/> and then by <gap/> thing have been preserved been <gap/> by them.  And of their number and preservation is not the <gap/> as plenty to be seen in the profit regard.<lb/><!-- 3 lines of text written above this and surrounded by dividing lines --> reaped by the creators and preserved, as that of the<lb/>source of the field in the crop, <gap/> for by the husbandman,<lb/> at <add>in</add> whose <sic>expence</sic> <add><gap/></add> the saving was performed.</p> <!-- In the margin above the previous text --> <p>Now then of one indication given <add>above the <gap/> of action is the subject</add> of imperfection in this<lb/> or any other shape what is the <del>effect</del> <gap/> if it creates and<lb/>preserves is the effect?  In the first place, a <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/> <gap/><lb/>in the manner in which the <gap/> is given a pretence, <add><gap/> <gap/> and means</add> can<lb/> be found for <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>cracking this <gap/></add> by which it was given; if this<lb/>can not be done, then a determination to turn aside from the subject and that as<lb/>little of<lb/>it as<lb/>possible.</p>                             




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:27, 10 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Apr. 22

Radicalism not dangerous
(3) §. Rulers disregard
1. Public 2. Appeal

In the Statute Book are to be found a whole class of
Statutes termed known by the general appellation of Statutes for
the amendment of the law. These Statutes term with instruction information
for those who are at once able and willing to make
use of it. To enumerate the make out a distinct part
of the several abolished or professed to be abolished
by them would be a useful work, but it is of the
number of them useful which has not been never yet executed.
This argument fifty of them: of the happen
but twenty of them suppose Not one of these twenty but
upon examination made use this view would of
itself suffice to demonstrate the impossibility that in the
breasts of these to viz when the branch of law called Common
Law had its authors, any regard for the happiness
interest of the people, any regard for interests of justice, and
any regard for interests other than there are personal
and security interest lend pleas. Well then with
all these foul spots in it was it the less ?
entitled to the appellation of the perfection of reason? Not it
indeed, if to know whether it be you apply to any of those whose
profit is derived from them, that same spot reckoning from Lord Cok
Chief Justice Coke is if you choose to go so far have patience truth from
the 6th Lord Chancellor Fortescue, to the Lord
Chancellor that now is to be he who he may, through Mr
Justice Sir William Blackstone. Like those in the chamber, the spots
in the opinion of the perfector of reason are ever on the
change. Yet so long as any particle of the rule of action
remains in this state, if it be a thousand years
ask of those who see their profit in them whether it be any
thing less than the perfection of reason, the answer will still be in the
negative.

[+]
For these 14 years
past by the pen which
writes this a catalogue
resembling this a precept
has been presented
to the public
eye. In the
Reform Act
eight and twenty distinct
sources of fallacies
delay, vexation and
expence in judicature
have been enumerated
and held together in
form of a truth. In
every one of them so
as suitors, could
these injured persons
who but for these impediments
would have been
suitors have been
sufferers by those
abomination, as
sure have these by whom
they and then by thing have been preserved been by them. And of their number and preservation is not the as plenty to be seen in the profit regard.
reaped by the creators and preserved, as that of the
source of the field in the crop, for by the husbandman,
at in whose expence the saving was performed.

Now then of one indication given above the of action is the subject of imperfection in this
or any other shape what is the effect if it creates and
preserves is the effect? In the first place, a be
in the manner in which the is given a pretence, and means can
be found for cracking this by which it was given; if this
can not be done, then a determination to turn aside from the subject and that as
little of
it as
possible.



Identifier: | JB/137/254/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-04-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

254

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46971

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in