JB/123/243/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/123/243/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


It is evident, that supposing the <del>total</del> annual<lb/>
<p>It is evident, that supposing the <del>total</del> annual<lb/>
<add>total of</add> expence to remain the same, if the numbers<lb/>
<add>total of</add> expence to remain the same, if the numbers<lb/>
provided for increase; the rate of expence per head<lb/>
provided for increase; the rate of expence per head<lb/>
Line 18: Line 18:
this case, the rate of increase appears likely<lb/>
this case, the rate of increase appears likely<lb/>
to be considerably destrained.  In this state of<lb/>
to be considerably destrained.  In this state of<lb/>
<add>restraint</add> restriction it appears <del>form</del><add>by</add> an observation from<lb/>
<note><add>||</add> Appendix</note> the Secretary of State's Office <add>||</add> that the <add>convict</add> population<lb/>
<note> AT the end of the Autumn<lb/>
of the Convicts in Great Britain</note> of this Colony has contained all along: <add>it is given as</add> the reason<lb/>
and the only reason why more are not sent, that<lb/>
in the present state of the Colony in respect of produce,<lb/>
<del>nor</del> a greater number could not consistently<lb/>
with security in point of subsistence<lb/>
be received.  Had it not been for this check, more<lb/>
would have been sent, and <del>though</del> thereby the<lb/>
annual total of expence would have been increased:<lb/>
but as the fixed and general expences of<lb/>
the Colony would not have received an accession, or<lb/>
at least any accession equally gradual, the probability<lb/>
in that case is that for the same time at least<lb/>
the rate of expence per head would not have<lb/>
increased but <del><gap/></del>  decreased: except and untill in<lb/>
consideration of the <del>growing</del><add>increasing</add> influx of the persons to be<lb/>
governed, any <del>sudden</del> addition came to be made to the <add>number</add><lb/>
<note>number of persons <del>to be</del><lb/>
<del>governed</del> sharing in the gov<del>ernment</del><lb/>
<add>ment as in the case of the establishment<lb/>
of a m<gap/>-post</add> which addition <lb/>
would <add>of</add> course be in some degree<lb/>
a sudden one.</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 20:37, 27 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

It is evident, that supposing the total annual
total of expence to remain the same, if the numbers
provided for increase; the rate of expence per head
will proportionably decreasediminish:: of the numbers provided
for decrease, and the rate of expence per head will does proportionably
increase: supposing the total annual
expence to increase, if the numbers provided for remain
the same, the rate of expence per head will
proportionably increase: if the number provided for
do not increasedecrease, then if the rate of increase per head
does not increase, or does not increase proportionably the total expence must
necessarily diminish. In this last way the expence
of this colony seems not unlikely to diminish
or at any rate, by the operation of
this case, the rate of increase appears likely
to be considerably destrained. In this state of
restraint restriction it appears formby an observation from
|| Appendix the Secretary of State's Office || that the convict population
AT the end of the Autumn
of the Convicts in Great Britain
of this Colony has contained all along: it is given as the reason
and the only reason why more are not sent, that
in the present state of the Colony in respect of produce,
nor a greater number could not consistently
with security in point of subsistence
be received. Had it not been for this check, more
would have been sent, and though thereby the
annual total of expence would have been increased:
but as the fixed and general expences of
the Colony would not have received an accession, or
at least any accession equally gradual, the probability
in that case is that for the same time at least
the rate of expence per head would not have
increased but decreased: except and untill in
consideration of the growingincreasing influx of the persons to be
governed, any sudden addition came to be made to the number
number of persons to be
governed sharing in the government
ment as in the case of the establishment
of a m-post
which addition
would of course be in some degree
a sudden one.




Identifier: | JB/123/243/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

243

Info in main headings field

tothill fields bill heads

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a8 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

see note 3 to letter 1392, vol. 6

ID Number

41669

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in