★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1820 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 31<lb/>Radicalism</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p.<note>111<lb/>II</note><lb/> (8) <note>Charlemont treachery</note></p> <p>In p. 267 <del>M</del> the biographer, <del>la</del> <add>producing</add. covering with scorn <add>the insincerity</add> all<lb/>other offers of seat sacrifice, insists upon <add>labours to persuade us of</add> an exception in<lb/>favour of his hero</p> <p> In p.267, all other offers of seat sacrifice are insincere<lb/>Lord Charlemont's alone sincere. Such is the position,<lb/>but more was <del>my</del> position more plainly <add>clearly</add> proved than this is<lb/>disproved by the evidence with which his <add>that evidence with which his</add> evidence has <gap/><lb/>us <del>The Bishop</del> In a tale <del>the Bishop with Lord Charlemont</del> <add>a tale the Bishop <gap/> <gap/> the</add><lb/><del>the Bishop <gap/> of the mask from the <add>his</add> noble face.</del><lb/>Earl: the Earl <del>of course is angry</del> in his anger, <del>a<d/el;. casts it off<lb/>altogether. "I will go no further" are his last words. Why?<lb/>because every thing beyond <del>parti</del> parliamentary reform, and<lb/>that in <hi rend="underline">no specific mode</hi> p.259 and left "entirely <del>to the</del><lb/>p.260 to the mature deliberation of Parliament "who are<lb/>(p.259) "the wisest <del>mode of</del> men of the Kingdom" would<lb/>(p.268.) be "inconsistent with the public peace.</p> <p>In p.271 we are pretty plainly informed — that with a<lb/>determination to do his utmost to exclude Parliamentary Reform<lb/>it was <del>a deter</del> at the same time his <!-- bracket in pencil --> [determination <add>Lordships endeavour</add> to do his<lb/>utmost] to persuade the Convention that he would do his utmost<lb/>to provide it.<add>bring it to effect</add> Anxious as he was for the reform<lb/>no scheme for that purpose would he propose himself, is first to<lb/>oppose if proposed by any body else But "the Convention being<lb/>"previously <sic>desolved</sic>" (p.271) should <hi rend="underline">after its <gap/></hi>" bring a<lb/>"scheme of reform . . . before their County meetings <hi rend="underline">regularly</hi><lb/>"convened: <sic>i.e.</sic> convened in a manner which those on whom<lb/>it <gap/> could and would take care should be impossible: which<lb/><add>impossibility</add></p><!-- continues in margin --> <p>impossibility being surmounted,<lb/>the now-existing<lb/>Convention, or some other<lb/><del>unnamed</del> non existing<lb/>and undistinguished entity<lb/> was " to recommend <del><gap/></del> such<lb/>measure to their representatives,<lb/>and <gap/><lb/>Parliament: <sic>i.e.</sic> to those<lb/>nominal representatives<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> now when nobody put their <del>patro</del> Noble and other patrons had any influence, and at whose expense, if any thing, every thing was to be done.|</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1820 Jany 31
Radicalism <p.111
II
(8) Charlemont treachery
In p. 267 M the biographer, la producing</add. covering with scorn <add>the insincerity all
other offers of seat sacrifice, insists upon labours to persuade us of an exception in
favour of his hero
In p.267, all other offers of seat sacrifice are insincere
Lord Charlemont's alone sincere. Such is the position,
but more was my position more plainly clearly proved than this is
disproved by the evidence with which his that evidence with which his evidence has
us The Bishop In a tale the Bishop with Lord Charlemont a tale the Bishop the
the Bishop of the mask from the his noble face.
Earl: the Earl of course is angry in his anger, a<d/el;. casts it off
altogether. "I will go no further" are his last words. Why?
because every thing beyond parti parliamentary reform, and
that in no specific mode p.259 and left "entirely to the
p.260 to the mature deliberation of Parliament "who are
(p.259) "the wisest mode of men of the Kingdom" would
(p.268.) be "inconsistent with the public peace.
In p.271 we are pretty plainly informed — that with a
determination to do his utmost to exclude Parliamentary Reform
it was a deter at the same time his [determination Lordships endeavour to do his
utmost] to persuade the Convention that he would do his utmost
to provide it.bring it to effect Anxious as he was for the reform
no scheme for that purpose would he propose himself, is first to
oppose if proposed by any body else But "the Convention being
"previously desolved" (p.271) should after its " bring a
"scheme of reform . . . before their County meetings regularly
"convened: i.e. convened in a manner which those on whom
it could and would take care should be impossible: which
impossibility
impossibility being surmounted,
the now-existing
Convention, or some other
unnamed non existing
and undistinguished entity
was " to recommend such
measure to their representatives,
and
Parliament: i.e. to those
nominal representatives
now when nobody put their patro Noble and other patrons had any influence, and at whose expense, if any thing, every thing was to be done.|
|
Identifier: | JB/137/314/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-01-31 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
314 |
radicalism |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
collectanea |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1816 |
|||
|
47031 |
|||
