★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1. <del><gap/><gap/></del> It is unnecessary to <unclear>move</unclear> such<lb/> a Court to try Judges. What is there that should<lb/> hinder Judges from trying one another as they have <lb/> been used to? each Judge having as I have<lb/> given him, criminal jurisdiction over every Judge<lb/> subordinate to him in the way of appeal. Appeal<lb/> in <unclear>printing</unclear> and blameless errors will naturally<lb/> <gap/> and the wilful and criminal errors should<lb/> very much be mixed with them. The only hardship<lb/> upon my plan with respect to Judges is that a<lb/> Judge the higher he stands in the <gap/> will have<lb/> the <gap/> of the benefit of Appeal: a Judge of a<lb/> Department Court for instance having <del>none</del> <add>no Court</add> above<lb/> him but the Metropolitan Court would have no<lb/> appeal at all: | <p>1. <del><gap/><gap/></del> It is unnecessary to <unclear>move</unclear> such<lb/> a Court to try Judges. What is there that should<lb/> hinder Judges from trying one another as they have <lb/> been used to? each Judge having as I have<lb/> given him, criminal jurisdiction over every Judge<lb/> subordinate to him in the way of appeal. Appeal<lb/> in <unclear>printing</unclear> and blameless errors will naturally<lb/> <gap/> and the wilful and criminal errors should<lb/> very much be mixed with them. The only hardship<lb/> upon my plan with respect to Judges is that a<lb/> Judge the higher he stands in the <gap/> will have<lb/> the <gap/> of the benefit of Appeal: a Judge of a<lb/> Department Court for instance having <del>none</del> <add>no Court</add> above<lb/> him but the Metropolitan Court would have no<lb/> appeal at all: but this anomality if it is worth<lb/> while may be corrected by giving him an appeal<lb/> from one Judge of <del><gap/></del> the Metropolitan Court<lb/> to another. It can not at any rate be cited as<lb/> a hardship by the Committee for they give <unclear>an</unclear><lb/> appeal in any of these cases to any body.</p> | ||
<p>2. The same observations apply with little difference<lb/> to the other classes of official criminals to members<lb/> of the Representative <del><gap/></del> <gap/> Administration <gap/><lb/> and to Ministers. <del>With respect to all of</del></p> | |||
With respect to all of them then trying them <add>before</add><pb/> | |||
1. It is unnecessary to move such
a Court to try Judges. What is there that should
hinder Judges from trying one another as they have
been used to? each Judge having as I have
given him, criminal jurisdiction over every Judge
subordinate to him in the way of appeal. Appeal
in printing and blameless errors will naturally
and the wilful and criminal errors should
very much be mixed with them. The only hardship
upon my plan with respect to Judges is that a
Judge the higher he stands in the will have
the of the benefit of Appeal: a Judge of a
Department Court for instance having none no Court above
him but the Metropolitan Court would have no
appeal at all: but this anomality if it is worth
while may be corrected by giving him an appeal
from one Judge of the Metropolitan Court
to another. It can not at any rate be cited as
a hardship by the Committee for they give an
appeal in any of these cases to any body.
2. The same observations apply with little difference
to the other classes of official criminals to members
of the Representative Administration
and to Ministers. With respect to all of
With respect to all of them then trying them before
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/051/210/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
210 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f5 / f6 / f7 / f8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
benjamin constant |
|||
|
16375 |
|||
