JB/141/112/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/112/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Forfeiture of Reputation</head>
 
of reputation or good will call that which any given member<lb/>
of the community <del>happens</del> <add>may be deemed</add> to possess, who has no<lb/>
rank and who either has neither merits nor demerits,<lb/>
of such a human being be conceivable, or rather whose<lb/>
merits stand exactly upon a level with his demerits.<lb/>
All <hi rend="underline">above</hi> this average quantity may be stiled<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">good</hi> reputation, all <hi rend="underline">below</hi> it <hi rend="underline">bad</hi> reputation. If<lb/>
one senses then a total forfeiture of reputation should<lb/>
consist of nothing more than a total forfeiture of<lb/>
good reputation as thus defined. <add>Now then</add>
According to this<lb/>
account of the matter <del>indeed</del> a total forfeiture of<lb/>
reputation would be nothing more than what is very<lb/>
possible and <add>indeed</add> must be very frequent. But it is<lb/>
plain this is not what the Jurists nor indeed what<lb/>
persons in general in speaking of is total forfeiture<lb/>
of reputation have in view. For all that this would<lb/>
amount to <add>would be the reducing</add> <del>the putting</del> the delinquent to a level with<lb/>
a
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 00:29, 29 March 2020

Click Here To Edit

Forfeiture of Reputation

of reputation or good will call that which any given member
of the community happens may be deemed to possess, who has no
rank and who either has neither merits nor demerits,
of such a human being be conceivable, or rather whose
merits stand exactly upon a level with his demerits.
All above this average quantity may be stiled
good reputation, all below it bad reputation. If
one senses then a total forfeiture of reputation should
consist of nothing more than a total forfeiture of
good reputation as thus defined. Now then According to this
account of the matter indeed a total forfeiture of
reputation would be nothing more than what is very
possible and indeed must be very frequent. But it is
plain this is not what the Jurists nor indeed what
persons in general in speaking of is total forfeiture
of reputation have in view. For all that this would
amount to would be the reducing the putting the delinquent to a level with
a





Identifier: | JB/141/112/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

24-25

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

forfeiture of reputation

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48329

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in