JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/027/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


under construction ...
<head>EVIDENCE.  <add>1*</add><!-- added in pencil -->  Number</head>
<p>reach him.  I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
<lb/>
had originally deposed to the treasonable <del>fact</del> <add>act</add> of which he was accused <add>Indicted</add> , by the <add>from the</add> evasion
<lb/>
of one of whom <add>it was that</add> the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
<lb/>
think it will hardly be contended <add>thought</add> that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on
<lb/>
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one &#x2014; exam
<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> in open Court &amp; cross-examined.
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent -->It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
<lb/>
of this provision ; <add>there being all probability that</add> the same <add>sense of</add> necessity which dictated one parliamentary <unclear><sic>infractio</sic></unclear><!-- unfinished word: infraction -->
<lb/>
<del><unclear>being</unclear></del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[<unclear>taught</unclear> &amp;]</add> justified &amp; instructed by
<lb/>
by this example .
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:04, 14 September 2011

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...


EVIDENCE. 1* Number

reach him. I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
had originally deposed to the treasonable fact act of which he was accused Indicted , by the from the evasion
of one of whom it was that the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
think it will hardly be contended thought that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one — exam
in open Court & cross-examined.

It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
of this provision ; there being all probability that the same sense of necessity which dictated one parliamentary infractio
being in a similar conjuncture would dictate to the same authority another: [taught &] justified & instructed by
by this example .



Identifier: | JB/051/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

evidence number

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16192

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in