★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/051/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
under construction ... | |||
<head>EVIDENCE. <add>1*</add><!-- added in pencil --> Number</head> | |||
<p>reach him. I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses | |||
<lb/> | |||
had originally deposed to the treasonable <del>fact</del> <add>act</add> of which he was accused <add>Indicted</add> , by the <add>from the</add> evasion | |||
<lb/> | |||
of one of whom <add>it was that</add> the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I | |||
<lb/> | |||
think it will hardly be contended <add>thought</add> that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on | |||
<lb/> | |||
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one — exam | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> in open Court & cross-examined. | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<p><!-- indent -->It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad | |||
<lb/> | |||
of this provision ; <add>there being all probability that</add> the same <add>sense of</add> necessity which dictated one parliamentary <unclear><sic>infractio</sic></unclear><!-- unfinished word: infraction --> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del><unclear>being</unclear></del> in a similar conjuncture would dictate <add>to the same authority</add> another: <add>[<unclear>taught</unclear> &]</add> justified & instructed by | |||
<lb/> | |||
by this example . | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
under construction ...
EVIDENCE. 1* Number
reach him. I must not indeed dispensible that the preamble states that two witnesses
had originally deposed to the treasonable fact act of which he was accused Indicted , by the from the evasion
of one of whom it was that the deficiency accrued which was thus to be supplied : but I
think it will hardly be contended thought that the testimony of 2 witnesses examined on
one side only and in secret is more than an equivalent for that of one — exam
in open Court & cross-examined.
It is easy to conceive that in the event of things , the efficacy whether good or bad
of this provision ; there being all probability that the same sense of necessity which dictated one parliamentary infractio
being in a similar conjuncture would dictate to the same authority another: [taught &] justified & instructed by
by this example .
Identifier: | JB/051/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
027 |
evidence number |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1* |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
cc1 |
|||
16192 |
|||