JB/071/049/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/049/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/049/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/049/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
26<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
C
 
<head>Of Theft</head><lb/>
<head>Question IV</head><lb/>
Why the hard labour as to all but a small<lb/> part of it is allowed to be communted into fine?<lb/>Reasons<lb/> 1. Because <del><gap/></del> pecuniary punishment is in<lb/> <del>general</del> itself the most eligible kind of punishment.<lb/> See <hi rend='superscript'>Tit</hi> [ Imp. pers. Injuries]Quest. i Insomuch that the<lb/> only uncertainty of a man's having wherewithall<lb/> to undergo it is <del><gap/></del> <add>in this as in</add> many cases the only<lb/> reason for having recourse to any other.<lb/> To p. 33<lb/><pb/> From P. 33<lb/> <head>Question V</head><lb/> Why a part of the hard labour is reserved<lb/> so as not to be commuted for.<lb/>Reasons<lb/>
1.  To avoid giving disatisfaction to the people: meaning<lb/> the poorer classes, which as being the most<lb/> numerous <del> have the greatest</del> claim the most regard.<lb/> To the purpose of <add>marking the offence with</add> <del><gap/><gap/></del> infamy the <gap/><lb/>ignominious part of the punishment is<lb/> <add>indeed</add> more peculiarly appropriated.  But the punishment<lb/> of hard labor comes in for its share<lb/> in producing the same effect.  It might therefore<lb/> form an invidious distinction, if there were any<lb/> one sort of punishment which it were in the power<lb/> of wealth to exempt a man from and if the rich <add>as</add>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:41, 14 September 2011

Click Here To Edit 26
C Of Theft
Question IV
Why the hard labour as to all but a small
part of it is allowed to be communted into fine?
Reasons
1. Because pecuniary punishment is in
general itself the most eligible kind of punishment.
See Tit [ Imp. pers. Injuries]Quest. i Insomuch that the
only uncertainty of a man's having wherewithall
to undergo it is in this as in many cases the only
reason for having recourse to any other.
To p. 33

---page break---
From P. 33
Question V
Why a part of the hard labour is reserved
so as not to be commuted for.
Reasons
1. To avoid giving disatisfaction to the people: meaning
the poorer classes, which as being the most
numerous have the greatest claim the most regard.
To the purpose of marking the offence with infamy the
ignominious part of the punishment is
indeed more peculiarly appropriated. But the punishment
of hard labor comes in for its share
in producing the same effect. It might therefore
form an invidious distinction, if there were any
one sort of punishment which it were in the power
of wealth to exempt a man from and if the rich as



Identifier: | JB/071/049/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

049

Info in main headings field

of theft reasons

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23452

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in