JB/137/128/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/128/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/128/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/128/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>1819 Decr 31</p>
<head>Radicalism not dangerous</head>
<note>Nature of the case<lb/>
&sect;.9.IX Accomplishment impossible:<lb/>
design impossible</note><lb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><del>Such is the prospect that which</del></p>
 


<p>Such is the condition, in which the <add>receipt</add> <del>reception</del><lb/>
of the supposed <add>benefit</add> the labourer in husbandry would <del>be pl<gap/>d</del><lb/>
find themselves placed: such the prospect which it <lb/>
<del>holds out</del> would hold out to them. The labourers in<lb/>
manufactures &#x2014; and other labourers <del>whom of whom labour</del><lb/>
<del>neither</del> other than those in husbandry, what is the prospect<lb/>
<del>which</del> it would hold out <hi rend="underline">then</hi>?  In comparison<lb/>
of them let the both of the <del>husban</del> man bred up in<lb/>
husbandry labour, <del><gap/></del> <gap/>ium as we have seen<lb/>
it, would be an <del>was</del> enviable one.  <add>The period around</add> <del>At the period</del> the<lb/>
husbandman would have nothing to h<gap/>.  The man has<lb/>
bondsman would have every thing to <gap/>: <del>and in the</del> digging<lb/>
<add><del>manuring</del></add> <del><gap/> weeding</del> manuring, <del><gap/></del> sowing, <del>manuring</del><add>weeding, reaping</add><lb/>
every thing: <add>all this he would have to <gap/></add> and in the mean time he would have <lb/>
to starve.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 07:56, 18 April 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Decr 31

Radicalism not dangerous Nature of the case
§.9.IX Accomplishment impossible:
design impossible

Such is the prospect that which

Such is the condition, in which the receipt reception
of the supposed benefit the labourer in husbandry would be pld
find themselves placed: such the prospect which it
holds out would hold out to them. The labourers in
manufactures — and other labourers whom of whom labour
neither other than those in husbandry, what is the prospect
which it would hold out then? In comparison
of them let the both of the husban man bred up in
husbandry labour, ium as we have seen
it, would be an was enviable one. The period around At the period the
husbandman would have nothing to h. The man has
bondsman would have every thing to : and in the digging
manuring weeding manuring, sowing, manuringweeding, reaping
every thing: all this he would have to and in the mean time he would have
to starve.



Identifier: | JB/137/128/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

128

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…> co

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46845

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in